Excitation and use of guided surface waves

ABSTRACT

Disclosed are various embodiments for transmitting and receiving energy conveyed in the form of a guided surface-waveguide mode along the surface of a lossy medium such as, e.g., a terrestrial medium excited by a guided surface waveguide probe.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is related to co-pending U.S. Non-provisional patent application entitled “Excitation and Use of Guided Surface Wave Modes on Lossy Media,” which was filed on Mar. 7, 2013 and assigned application Ser. No. 13/789,538, and was published on Sep. 11, 2014 as Publication Number US2014/0252886 A1, and which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is also related to co-pending U.S. Non-provisional patent application entitled “Excitation and Use of Guided Surface Wave Modes on Lossy Media,” which was filed on Mar. 7, 2013 and assigned application Ser. No. 13/789,525, and was published on Sep. 11, 2014 as Publication Number US2014/0252865 A1, and which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is further related to co-pending U.S. Non-provisional patent application entitled “Excitation and Use of Guided Surface Wave Modes on Lossy Media,” which was filed on Sep. 10, 2014 and assigned application Ser. No. 14/483,089, and which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is further related to co-pending U.S. Non-provisional patent application entitled “Excitation and Use of Guided Surface Wave Modes on Lossy Media,” which was filed on Jun. 2, 2015 and assigned application Ser. No. ______ (under Attorney Docket Number: 170300-1750), and which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

For over a century, signals transmitted by radio waves involved radiation fields launched using conventional antenna structures. In contrast to radio science, electrical power distribution systems in the last century involved the transmission of energy guided along electrical conductors. This understanding of the distinction between radio frequency (RF) and power transmission has existed since the early 1900's.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Many aspects of the present disclosure can be better understood with reference to the following drawings. The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the disclosure. Moreover, in the drawings, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.

FIG. 1 is a chart that depicts field strength as a function of distance for a guided electromagnetic field and a radiated electromagnetic field.

FIG. 2 is a drawing that illustrates a propagation interface with two regions employed for transmission of a guided surface wave according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 3 is a drawing that illustrates a guided surface waveguide probe disposed with respect to a propagation interface of FIG. 2 according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 4 is a plot of an example of the magnitudes of close-in and far-out asymptotes of first order Hankel functions according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIGS. 5A and 5B are drawings that illustrate a complex angle of incidence of an electric field synthesized by a guided surface waveguide probe according to the various embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 6 is a graphical representation illustrating the effect of elevation of a charge terminal on the location where the electric field of FIG. 5A intersects with the lossy conducting medium at a Brewster angle according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 7 is a graphical representation of an example of a guided surface waveguide probe according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIGS. 8A through 8C are graphical representations illustrating examples of equivalent image plane models of the guided surface waveguide probe of FIGS. 3 and 7 according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIGS. 9A and 9B are graphical representations illustrating examples of single-wire transmission line and classic transmission line models of the equivalent image plane models of FIGS. 8B and 8C according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 10 is a flow chart illustrating an example of adjusting a guided surface waveguide probe of FIGS. 3 and 7 to launch a guided surface wave along the surface of a lossy conducting medium according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 11 is a plot illustrating an example of the relationship between a wave tilt angle and the phase delay of a guided surface waveguide probe of FIGS. 3 and 7 according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 12 is a Smith chart illustrating an example of adjusting the load impedance of the guided surface waveguide probe of FIGS. 3 and 7 according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 13 is a plot comparing measured and theoretical field strength of the guided surface waveguide probe of FIGS. 3 and 7 according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIGS. 14A through 14C depict examples of receiving structures that can be employed to receive energy transmitted in the form of a guided surface wave launched by a guided surface waveguide probe according to the various embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 14D is a flow chart illustrating an example of adjusting a receiving structure according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 15 depicts an example of an additional receiving structure that can be employed to receive energy transmitted in the form of a guided surface wave launched by a guided surface waveguide probe according to the various embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 16A depicts a schematic diagram representing the Thevenin-equivalent of the receivers depicted in FIGS. 14A and 14B according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 16B depicts a schematic diagram representing the Norton-equivalent of the receiver depicted in FIG. 15 according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIGS. 17A and 17B are schematic diagrams representing examples of a conductivity measurement probe and an open wire line probe, respectively, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 18 is a schematic drawing of an example of an adaptive control system employed by the probe control system of FIG. 3 according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIGS. 19A-19B and 20 are drawings of examples of variable terminals for use as a charging terminal according to various embodiments of the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

To begin, some terminology shall be established to provide clarity in the discussion of concepts to follow. First, as contemplated herein, a formal distinction is drawn between radiated electromagnetic fields and guided electromagnetic fields.

As contemplated herein, a radiated electromagnetic field comprises electromagnetic energy that is emitted from a source structure in the form of waves that are not bound to a waveguide. For example, a radiated electromagnetic field is generally a field that leaves an electric structure such as an antenna and propagates through the atmosphere or other medium and is not bound to any waveguide structure. Once radiated electromagnetic waves leave an electric structure such as an antenna, they continue to propagate in the medium of propagation (such as air) independent of their source until they dissipate regardless of whether the source continues to operate. Once electromagnetic waves are radiated, they are not recoverable unless intercepted, and, if not intercepted, the energy inherent in the radiated electromagnetic waves is lost forever. Electrical structures such as antennas are designed to radiate electromagnetic fields by maximizing the ratio of the radiation resistance to the structure loss resistance. Radiated energy spreads out in space and is lost regardless of whether a receiver is present. The energy density of the radiated fields is a function of distance due to geometric spreading. Accordingly, the term “radiate” in all its forms as used herein refers to this form of electromagnetic propagation.

A guided electromagnetic field is a propagating electromagnetic wave whose energy is concentrated within or near boundaries between media having different electromagnetic properties. In this sense, a guided electromagnetic field is one that is bound to a waveguide and may be characterized as being conveyed by the current flowing in the waveguide. If there is no load to receive and/or dissipate the energy conveyed in a guided electromagnetic wave, then no energy is lost except for that dissipated in the conductivity of the guiding medium. Stated another way, if there is no load for a guided electromagnetic wave, then no energy is consumed. Thus, a generator or other source generating a guided electromagnetic field does not deliver real power unless a resistive load is present. To this end, such a generator or other source essentially runs idle until a load is presented. This is akin to running a generator to generate a 60 Hertz electromagnetic wave that is transmitted over power lines where there is no electrical load. It should be noted that a guided electromagnetic field or wave is the equivalent to what is termed a “transmission line mode.” This contrasts with radiated electromagnetic waves in which real power is supplied at all times in order to generate radiated waves. Unlike radiated electromagnetic waves, guided electromagnetic energy does not continue to propagate along a finite length waveguide after the energy source is turned off. Accordingly, the term “guide” in all its forms as used herein refers to this transmission mode of electromagnetic propagation.

Referring now to FIG. 1, shown is a graph 100 of field strength in decibels (dB) above an arbitrary reference in volts per meter as a function of distance in kilometers on a log-dB plot to further illustrate the distinction between radiated and guided electromagnetic fields. The graph 100 of FIG. 1 depicts a guided field strength curve 103 that shows the field strength of a guided electromagnetic field as a function of distance. This guided field strength curve 103 is essentially the same as a transmission line mode. Also, the graph 100 of FIG. 1 depicts a radiated field strength curve 106 that shows the field strength of a radiated electromagnetic field as a function of distance.

Of interest are the shapes of the curves 103 and 106 for guided wave and for radiation propagation, respectively. The radiated field strength curve 106 falls off geometrically (1/d, where d is distance), which is depicted as a straight line on the log-log scale. The guided field strength curve 103, on the other hand, has a characteristic exponential decay of e^(−αd)/√{square root over (d)} and exhibits a distinctive knee 109 on the log-log scale. The guided field strength curve 103 and the radiated field strength curve 106 intersect at point 113, which occurs at a crossing distance. At distances less than the crossing distance at intersection point 113, the field strength of a guided electromagnetic field is significantly greater at most locations than the field strength of a radiated electromagnetic field. At distances greater than the crossing distance, the opposite is true. Thus, the guided and radiated field strength curves 103 and 106 further illustrate the fundamental propagation difference between guided and radiated electromagnetic fields. For an informal discussion of the difference between guided and radiated electromagnetic fields, reference is made to Milligan, T., Modern Antenna Design, McGraw-Hill, 1^(st) Edition, 1985, pp. 8-9, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

The distinction between radiated and guided electromagnetic waves, made above, is readily expressed formally and placed on a rigorous basis. That two such diverse solutions could emerge from one and the same linear partial differential equation, the wave equation, analytically follows from the boundary conditions imposed on the problem. The Green function for the wave equation, itself, contains the distinction between the nature of radiation and guided waves.

In empty space, the wave equation is a differential operator whose eigenfunctions possess a continuous spectrum of eigenvalues on the complex wave-number plane. This transverse electro-magnetic (TEM) field is called the radiation field, and those propagating fields are called “Hertzian waves.” However, in the presence of a conducting boundary, the wave equation plus boundary conditions mathematically lead to a spectral representation of wave-numbers composed of a continuous spectrum plus a sum of discrete spectra. To this end, reference is made to Sommerfeld, A., “Uber die Ausbreitung der Wellen in der Drahtlosen Telegraphie,” Annalen der Physik, Vol. 28, 1909, pp. 665-736. Also see Sommerfeld, A., “Problems of Radio,” published as Chapter 6 in Partial Differential Equations in Physics—Lectures on Theoretical Physics: Volume VI, Academic Press, 1949, pp. 236-289, 295-296; Collin, R. E., “Hertzian Dipole Radiating Over a Lossy Earth or Sea: Some Early and Late 20^(th) Century Controversies,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Vol. 46, No. 2, April 2004, pp. 64-79; and Reich, H. J., Ordnung, P. F, Krauss, H. L., and Skalnik, J. G., Microwave Theory and Techniques, Van Nostrand, 1953, pp. 291-293, each of these references being incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

The terms “ground wave” and “surface wave” identify two distinctly different physical propagation phenomena. A surface wave arises analytically from a distinct pole yielding a discrete component in the plane wave spectrum. See, e.g., “The Excitation of Plane Surface Waves” by Cullen, A. L., (Proceedings of the IEE (British), Vol. 101, Part IV, August 1954, pp. 225-235). In this context, a surface wave is considered to be a guided surface wave. The surface wave (in the Zenneck-Sommerfeld guided wave sense) is, physically and mathematically, not the same as the ground wave (in the Weyl-Norton-FCC sense) that is now so familiar from radio broadcasting. These two propagation mechanisms arise from the excitation of different types of eigenvalue spectra (continuum or discrete) on the complex plane. The field strength of the guided surface wave decays exponentially with distance as illustrated by curve 103 of FIG. 1 (much like propagation in a lossy waveguide) and resembles propagation in a radial transmission line, as opposed to the classical Hertzian radiation of the ground wave, which propagates spherically, possesses a continuum of eigenvalues, falls off geometrically as illustrated by curve 106 of FIG. 1, and results from branch-cut integrals. As experimentally demonstrated by C. R. Burrows in “The Surface Wave in Radio Propagation over Plane Earth” (Proceedings of the IRE, Vol. 25, No. 2, February, 1937, pp. 219-229) and “The Surface Wave in Radio Transmission” (Bell Laboratories Record, Vol. 15, June 1937, pp. 321-324), vertical antennas radiate ground waves but do not launch guided surface waves.

To summarize the above, first, the continuous part of the wave-number eigenvalue spectrum, corresponding to branch-cut integrals, produces the radiation field, and second, the discrete spectra, and corresponding residue sum arising from the poles enclosed by the contour of integration, result in non-TEM traveling surface waves that are exponentially damped in the direction transverse to the propagation. Such surface waves are guided transmission line modes. For further explanation, reference is made to Friedman, B., Principles and Techniques of Applied Mathematics, Wiley, 1956, pp. pp. 214, 283-286, 290, 298-300.

In free space, antennas excite the continuum eigenvalues of the wave equation, which is a radiation field, where the outwardly propagating RF energy with E_(z) and H_(φ) in-phase is lost forever. On the other hand, waveguide probes excite discrete eigenvalues, which results in transmission line propagation. See Collin, R. E., Field Theory of Guided Waves, McGraw-Hill, 1960, pp. 453, 474-477. While such theoretical analyses have held out the hypothetical possibility of launching open surface guided waves over planar or spherical surfaces of lossy, homogeneous media, for more than a century no known structures in the engineering arts have existed for accomplishing this with any practical efficiency. Unfortunately, since it emerged in the early 1900's, the theoretical analysis set forth above has essentially remained a theory and there have been no known structures for practically accomplishing the launching of open surface guided waves over planar or spherical surfaces of lossy, homogeneous media.

According to the various embodiments of the present disclosure, various guided surface waveguide probes are described that are configured to excite electric fields that couple into a guided surface waveguide mode along the surface of a lossy conducting medium. Such guided electromagnetic fields are substantially mode-matched in magnitude and phase to a guided surface wave mode on the surface of the lossy conducting medium. Such a guided surface wave mode can also be termed a Zenneck waveguide mode. By virtue of the fact that the resultant fields excited by the guided surface waveguide probes described herein are substantially mode-matched to a guided surface waveguide mode on the surface of the lossy conducting medium, a guided electromagnetic field in the form of a guided surface wave is launched along the surface of the lossy conducting medium. According to one embodiment, the lossy conducting medium comprises a terrestrial medium such as the Earth.

Referring to FIG. 2, shown is a propagation interface that provides for an examination of the boundary value solutions to Maxwell's equations derived in 1907 by Jonathan Zenneck as set forth in his paper Zenneck, J., “On the Propagation of Plane Electromagnetic Waves Along a Flat Conducting Surface and their Relation to Wireless Telegraphy,” Annalen der Physik, Serial 4, Vol. 23, Sep. 20, 1907, pp. 846-866. FIG. 2 depicts cylindrical coordinates for radially propagating waves along the interface between a lossy conducting medium specified as Region 1 and an insulator specified as Region 2. Region 1 can comprise, for example, any lossy conducting medium. In one example, such a lossy conducting medium can comprise a terrestrial medium such as the Earth or other medium. Region 2 is a second medium that shares a boundary interface with Region 1 and has different constitutive parameters relative to Region 1. Region 2 can comprise, for example, any insulator such as the atmosphere or other medium. The reflection coefficient for such a boundary interface goes to zero only for incidence at a complex Brewster angle. See Stratton, J. A., Electromagnetic Theory, McGraw-Hill, 1941, p. 516.

According to various embodiments, the present disclosure sets forth various guided surface waveguide probes that generate electromagnetic fields that are substantially mode-matched to a guided surface waveguide mode on the surface of the lossy conducting medium comprising Region 1. According to various embodiments, such electromagnetic fields substantially synthesize a wave front incident at a complex Brewster angle of the lossy conducting medium that can result in zero reflection.

To explain further, in Region 2, where an e^(jωt) field variation is assumed and where ρ≠0 and z≧0 (with z being the vertical coordinate normal to the surface of Region 1, and ρ being the radial dimension in cylindrical coordinates), Zenneck's closed-form exact solution of Maxwell's equations satisfying the boundary conditions along the interface are expressed by the following electric field and magnetic field components:

$\begin{matrix} {{H_{2\; \varphi} = {A\; ^{{- u_{2}}z}\mspace{14mu} {H_{1}^{(2)}\left( {{- j}\; {\gamma\rho}} \right)}}},} & (1) \\ {{E_{2\; \rho} = {{A\left( \frac{u_{2}}{j\; {\omega ɛ}_{o}} \right)}^{{- u_{2}}z}\mspace{14mu} {H_{1}^{(2)}\left( {{- j}\; {\gamma\rho}} \right)}}},{and}} & (2) \\ {E_{2\; z} = {{A\left( \frac{- \gamma}{{\omega ɛ}_{o}} \right)}^{{- u_{2}}z}\mspace{14mu} {{H_{0}^{(2)}\left( {{- j}\; {\gamma\rho}} \right)}.}}} & (3) \end{matrix}$

In Region 1, where the e^(jωt) field variation is assumed and where ρ≠0 and z≦0, Zenneck's closed-form exact solution of Maxwell's equations satisfying the boundary conditions along the interface is expressed by the following electric field and magnetic field components:

$\begin{matrix} {{H_{1\varphi} = {A\; ^{u_{1}z}{H_{1}^{(2)}\left( {- {j\gamma\rho}} \right)}}},} & (4) \\ {{E_{1\rho} = {{A\left( \frac{- u_{1}}{\sigma_{1} + {j\omega ɛ}_{1}} \right)}^{u_{1}z}{H_{1}^{(2)}\left( {- {j\gamma\rho}} \right)}}},{and}} & (5) \\ {E_{1\; z} = {A\left( \frac{- {j\gamma}}{\sigma_{1} + {j\omega ɛ}_{1}} \right)^{u_{1}z}{{H_{0}^{(2)}\left( {- {j\gamma\rho}} \right)}.}}} & (6) \end{matrix}$

In these expressions, z is the vertical coordinate normal to the surface of Region 1 and ρ is the radial coordinate, H_(n) ⁽²⁾(−jγρ) is a complex argument Hankel function of the second kind and order n, u₁ is the propagation constant in the positive vertical (z) direction in Region 1, u₂ is the propagation constant in the vertical (z) direction in Region 2, σ₁ is the conductivity of Region 1, ω is equal to 2πf, where f is a frequency of excitation, ∈_(o) is the permittivity of free space, ∈₁ is the permittivity of Region 1, A is a source constant imposed by the source, and γ is a surface wave radial propagation constant.

The propagation constants in the ±z directions are determined by separating the wave equation above and below the interface between Regions 1 and 2, and imposing the boundary conditions. This exercise gives, in Region 2,

$\begin{matrix} {u_{2} = \frac{- {jk}_{o}}{\sqrt{1 + \left( {ɛ_{r} - {jx}} \right)}}} & (7) \end{matrix}$

and gives, in Region 1,

u ₁ =−u ₂(∈_(r) −jx).  (8)

The radial propagation constant γ is given by

$\begin{matrix} {{\gamma = {{j\sqrt{k_{o}^{2} + u_{2}^{2}}} = {j\frac{k_{o}n}{\sqrt{1 + n^{2}}}}}},} & (9) \end{matrix}$

which is a complex expression where n is the complex index of refraction given by

n=√{square root over (∈_(r) −jx)}.  (10)

In all of the above Equations,

$\begin{matrix} {{x = \frac{\sigma_{1}}{{\omega ɛ}_{o}}},{and}} & (11) \\ {{k_{o} = {{\omega \sqrt{\mu_{o}ɛ_{o}}} = \frac{\lambda_{o}}{2\pi}}},} & (12) \end{matrix}$

where ∈_(r) comprises the relative permittivity of Region 1, σ₁ is the conductivity of Region 1, ∈_(o) is the permittivity of free space, and μ_(o) comprises the permeability of free space. Thus, the generated surface wave propagates parallel to the interface and exponentially decays vertical to it. This is known as evanescence.

Thus, Equations (1)-(3) can be considered to be a cylindrically-symmetric, radially-propagating waveguide mode. See Barlow, H. M., and Brown, J., Radio Surface Waves, Oxford University Press, 1962, pp. 10-12, 29-33. The present disclosure details structures that excite this “open boundary” waveguide mode. Specifically, according to various embodiments, a guided surface waveguide probe is provided with a charge terminal of appropriate size that is fed with voltage and/or current and is positioned relative to the boundary interface between Region 2 and Region 1. This may be better understood with reference to FIG. 3, which shows an example of a guided surface waveguide probe 300 a that includes a charge terminal T₁ elevated above a lossy conducting medium 303 (e.g., the earth) along a vertical axis z that is normal to a plane presented by the lossy conducting medium 303. The lossy conducting medium 303 makes up Region 1, and a second medium 306 makes up Region 2 and shares a boundary interface with the lossy conducting medium 303.

According to one embodiment, the lossy conducting medium 303 can comprise a terrestrial medium such as the planet Earth. To this end, such a terrestrial medium comprises all structures or formations included thereon whether natural or man-made. For example, such a terrestrial medium can comprise natural elements such as rock, soil, sand, fresh water, sea water, trees, vegetation, and all other natural elements that make up our planet. In addition, such a terrestrial medium can comprise man-made elements such as concrete, asphalt, building materials, and other man-made materials. In other embodiments, the lossy conducting medium 303 can comprise some medium other than the Earth, whether naturally occurring or man-made. In other embodiments, the lossy conducting medium 303 can comprise other media such as man-made surfaces and structures such as automobiles, aircraft, man-made materials (such as plywood, plastic sheeting, or other materials) or other media.

In the case where the lossy conducting medium 303 comprises a terrestrial medium or Earth, the second medium 306 can comprise the atmosphere above the ground. As such, the atmosphere can be termed an “atmospheric medium” that comprises air and other elements that make up the atmosphere of the Earth. In addition, it is possible that the second medium 306 can comprise other media relative to the lossy conducting medium 303.

The guided surface waveguide probe 300 a includes a feed network 309 that couples an excitation source 312 to the charge terminal T₁ via, e.g., a vertical feed line conductor. According to various embodiments, a charge Q₁ is imposed on the charge terminal T₁ to synthesize an electric field based upon the voltage applied to terminal T₁ at any given instant. Depending on the angle of incidence (θ_(i)) of the electric field (E), it is possible to substantially mode-match the electric field to a guided surface waveguide mode on the surface of the lossy conducting medium 303 comprising Region 1.

By considering the Zenneck closed-form solutions of Equations (1)-(6), the Leontovich impedance boundary condition between Region 1 and Region 2 can be stated as

{circumflex over (z)}×{right arrow over (H)} ₂(ρ,φ,0)={right arrow over (J)} _(S),  (13)

where {circumflex over (z)} is a unit normal in the positive vertical (+z) direction and {right arrow over (H)}₂ is the magnetic field strength in Region 2 expressed by Equation (1) above. Equation (13) implies that the electric and magnetic fields specified in Equations (1)-(3) may result in a radial surface current density along the boundary interface, where the radial surface current density can be specified by

J _(ρ)(ρ′)=−AH ₁ ⁽²⁾(−jγρ′)  (14)

where A is a constant. Further, it should be noted that close-in to the guided surface waveguide probe 300 (for p<<λ), Equation (14) above has the behavior

$\begin{matrix} {{J_{close}\left( \rho^{\prime} \right)} = {\frac{- {A({j2})}}{\pi \left( {- {j\gamma\rho}^{\prime}} \right)} = {{- H_{\varphi}} = {- {\frac{I_{o}}{2{\pi\rho}^{\prime}}.}}}}} & (15) \end{matrix}$

The negative sign means that when source current (I_(o)) flows vertically upward as illustrated in FIG. 3, the “close-in” ground current flows radially inward. By field matching on H_(φ) “close-in,” it can be determined that

$\begin{matrix} {A = {{- \frac{I_{o}\gamma}{4}} = {- \frac{\omega \; q_{1}\gamma}{4}}}} & (16) \end{matrix}$

where q₁=C₁V₁, in Equations (1)-(6) and (14). Therefore, the radial surface current density of Equation (14) can be restated as

$\begin{matrix} {{J_{p}\left( \rho^{\prime} \right)} = {\frac{I_{o}\gamma}{4}{{H_{1}^{(2)}\left( {- {j\gamma\rho}^{\prime}} \right)}.}}} & (17) \end{matrix}$

The fields expressed by Equations (1)-(6) and (17) have the nature of a transmission line mode bound to a lossy interface, not radiation fields that are associated with groundwave propagation. See Barlow, H. M. and Brown, J., Radio Surface Waves, Oxford University Press, 1962, pp. 1-5.

At this point, a review of the nature of the Hankel functions used in Equations (1)-(6) and (17) is provided for these solutions of the wave equation. One might observe that the Hankel functions of the first and second kind and order n are defined as complex combinations of the standard Bessel functions of the first and second kinds

H _(n) ⁽¹⁾(x)=J _(n)(x)+jN _(n)(x), and  (18)

H _(n) ⁽²⁾(x)=J _(n)(x)−jN _(n)(x),  (19)

These functions represent cylindrical waves propagating radially inward (H_(n) ⁽¹⁾) and outward (H_(n) ⁽²⁾), respectively. The definition is analogous to the relationship e^(±jx)=cos x±j sin x. See, for example, Harrington, R. F., Time-Harmonic Fields, McGraw-Hill, 1961, pp. 460-463.

That H_(n) ⁽²⁾(k_(ρ)ρ) is an outgoing wave can be recognized from its large argument asymptotic behavior that is obtained directly from the series definitions of J_(n)(x) and N_(n)(x). Far-out from the guided surface waveguide probe:

$\begin{matrix} {{{{H_{n}^{(2)}(x)}\underset{x\rightarrow\infty}{\rightarrow}{\sqrt{\frac{2j}{\pi \; x}}j^{n}^{- {jx}}}} = {\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi \; x}}j^{n}^{- {j{({x - \frac{\pi}{4}})}}}}},} & \left( {20a} \right) \end{matrix}$

which, when multiplied by e^(jωt), is an outward propagating cylindrical wave of the form e^(j(ωt−kρ)) with a 1/√{square root over (ρ)} spatial variation. The first order (n=1) solution can be determined from Equation (20a) to be

$\begin{matrix} {{{H_{1}^{(2)}(x)}\underset{x\rightarrow\infty}{\rightarrow}{j\sqrt{\frac{2j}{\pi \; x}}^{- {jx}}}} = {\sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi \; x}}{^{- {j{({x - \frac{\pi}{2} - \frac{\pi}{4}})}}}.}}} & \left( {20b} \right) \end{matrix}$

Close-in to the guided surface waveguide probe (for ρ<<λ), the Hankel function of first order and the second kind behaves as

$\begin{matrix} {{H_{1}^{(2)}(x)}\underset{x\rightarrow 0}{\rightarrow}{\frac{2j}{\pi \; x}.}} & (21) \end{matrix}$

Note that these asymptotic expressions are complex quantities. When x is a real quantity, Equations (20b) and (21) differ in phase by √{square root over (j)}, which corresponds to an extra phase advance or “phase boost” of 45° or, equivalently, λ/8. The close-in and far-out asymptotes of the first order Hankel function of the second kind have a Hankel “crossover” or transition point where they are of equal magnitude at a distance of Σ=R_(x).

Thus, beyond the Hankel crossover point the “far out” representation predominates over the “close-in” representation of the Hankel function. The distance to the Hankel crossover point (or Hankel crossover distance) can be found by equating Equations (20b) and (21) for −jγρ, and solving for R_(x). With x=σ/ω∈_(o), it can be seen that the far-out and close-in Hankel function asymptotes are frequency dependent, with the Hankel crossover point moving out as the frequency is lowered. It should also be noted that the Hankel function asymptotes may also vary as the conductivity (σ) of the lossy conducting medium changes. For example, the conductivity of the soil can vary with changes in weather conditions.

Referring to FIG. 4, shown is an example of a plot of the magnitudes of the first order Hankel functions of Equations (20b) and (21) for a Region 1 conductivity of σ=0.010 mhos/m and relative permittivity ∈_(r)=15, at an operating frequency of 1850 kHz. Curve 403 is the magnitude of the far-out asymptote of Equation (20b) and curve 406 is the magnitude of the close-in asymptote of Equation (21), with the Hankel crossover point 409 occurring at a distance of R_(x)=54 feet. While the magnitudes are equal, a phase offset exists between the two asymptotes at the Hankel crossover point 409. It can also be seen that the Hankel crossover distance is much less than a wavelength of the operation frequency.

Considering the electric field components given by Equations (2) and (3) of the Zenneck closed-form solution in Region 2, it can be seen that the ratio of E_(z) and E_(ρ) asymptotically passes to

$\begin{matrix} {\frac{E_{z}}{E_{\rho}} = {{{\left( \frac{- {j\gamma}}{u_{2}} \right)\frac{H_{0}^{(2)}\left( {- {j\gamma\rho}} \right)}{H_{1}^{(2)}\left( {- {j\gamma\rho}} \right)}}\underset{p\rightarrow\infty}{\rightarrow}\sqrt{ɛ_{r} - {j\frac{\sigma}{{\omega ɛ}_{o}}}}} = {n = {\tan \; {\theta_{i}.}}}}} & (22) \end{matrix}$

where n is the complex index of refraction of Equation (10) and θ_(i) is the angle of incidence of the electric field. In addition, the vertical component of the mode-matched electric field of Equation (3) asymptotically passes to

$\begin{matrix} {{E_{2\; z}\underset{p\rightarrow\infty}{\rightarrow}{\left( \frac{q_{free}}{ɛ_{o}} \right)\sqrt{\frac{\gamma^{3}}{8\pi}}^{{- u_{2}}z}\frac{^{- {j{({{\gamma\rho} - {\pi/4}})}}}}{\sqrt{\rho}}}},} & (23) \end{matrix}$

which is linearly proportional to free charge on the isolated component of the elevated charge terminal's capacitance at the terminal voltage, q_(free)=C_(free)×V_(T).

For example, the height H₁ of the elevated charge terminal T₁ in FIG. 3 affects the amount of free charge on the charge terminal T₁. When the charge terminal T₁ is near the ground plane of Region 1, most of the charge Q₁ on the terminal is “bound.” As the charge terminal T₁ is elevated, the bound charge is lessened until the charge terminal T₁ reaches a height at which substantially all of the isolated charge is free.

The advantage of an increased capacitive elevation for the charge terminal T₁ is that the charge on the elevated charge terminal T₁ is further removed from the ground plane, resulting in an increased amount of free charge q_(free) to couple energy into the guided surface waveguide mode. As the charge terminal T₁ is moved away from the ground plane, the charge distribution becomes more uniformly distributed about the surface of the terminal. The amount of free charge is related to the self-capacitance of the charge terminal T₁.

For example, the capacitance of a spherical terminal can be expressed as a function of physical height above the ground plane. The capacitance of a sphere at a physical height of h above a perfect ground is given by

C _(elevated sphere)=4π∈_(o)α(1+M+M ² +M ³+2M ⁴+3M ⁵+ . . . ),  (24)

where the diameter of the sphere is 2a, and where M=a/2 h with h being the height of the spherical terminal. As can be seen, an increase in the terminal height h reduces the capacitance C of the charge terminal. It can be shown that for elevations of the charge terminal T₁ that are at a height of about four times the diameter (4D=8a) or greater, the charge distribution is approximately uniform about the spherical terminal, which can improve the coupling into the guided surface waveguide mode.

In the case of a sufficiently isolated terminal, the self-capacitance of a conductive sphere can be approximated by C=4π∈_(o)a, where a is the radius of the sphere in meters, and the self-capacitance of a disk can be approximated by C=8∈_(o)a, where a is the radius of the disk in meters. The charge terminal T₁ can include any shape such as a sphere, a disk, a cylinder, a cone, a torus, a hood, one or more rings, or any other randomized shape or combination of shapes. An equivalent spherical diameter can be determined and used for positioning of the charge terminal T₁.

This may be further understood with reference to the example of FIG. 3, where the charge terminal T₁ is elevated at a physical height of h_(p)=H₁ above the lossy conducting medium 303. To reduce the effects of the “bound” charge, the charge terminal T₁ can be positioned at a physical height that is at least four times the spherical diameter (or equivalent spherical diameter) of the charge terminal T₁ to reduce the bounded charge effects.

Referring next to FIG. 5A, shown is a ray optics interpretation of the electric field produced by the elevated charge Q₁ on charge terminal T₁ of FIG. 3. As in optics, minimizing the reflection of the incident electric field can improve and/or maximize the energy coupled into the guided surface waveguide mode of the lossy conducting medium 303. For an electric field (E_(∥)) that is polarized parallel to the plane of incidence (not the boundary interface), the amount of reflection of the incident electric field may be determined using the Fresnel reflection coefficient, which can be expressed as

$\begin{matrix} {{{\Gamma_{}\left( \theta_{i} \right)} = {\frac{E_{,R}}{E_{,i}} = \frac{\sqrt{\left( {ɛ_{r} - {j\; x}} \right) - {\sin^{2}\theta_{i}}} - {\left( {ɛ_{r} - {j\; x}} \right)\cos \; \theta_{i}}}{\sqrt{\left( {ɛ_{r} - {j\; x}} \right) - {\sin^{2}\theta_{i}}} + {\left( {ɛ_{r} - {j\; x}} \right)\cos \; \theta_{i}}}}},} & (25) \end{matrix}$

where θ_(i) is the conventional angle of incidence measured with respect to the surface normal.

In the example of FIG. 5A, the ray optic interpretation shows the incident field polarized parallel to the plane of incidence having an angle of incidence of θ_(i), which is measured with respect to the surface normal ({circumflex over (z)}). There will be no reflection of the incident electric field when Γ_(∥)(θ_(i))=0 and thus the incident electric field will be completely coupled into a guided surface waveguide mode along the surface of the lossy conducting medium 303. It can be seen that the numerator of Equation (25) goes to zero when the angle of incidence is

θ_(i)=arctan(√{square root over (∈_(r) −jx)})=θ_(i,B),  (26)

where x=σ/ω∈_(o). This complex angle of incidence (θ_(i,B)) is referred to as the Brewster angle. Referring back to Equation (22), it can be seen that the same complex Brewster angle (θ_(i,B)) relationship is present in both Equations (22) and (26).

As illustrated in FIG. 5A, the electric field vector E can be depicted as an incoming non-uniform plane wave, polarized parallel to the plane of incidence. The electric field vector E can be created from independent horizontal and vertical components as

{right arrow over (E)}(θ_(i))=E _(ρ) {circumflex over (ρ)}+E _(z) {circumflex over (z)}.  (27)

Geometrically, the illustration in FIG. 5A suggests that the electric field vector E can be given by

$\begin{matrix} {{{E_{\rho}\left( {\rho,z} \right)} = {{E\left( {\rho,z} \right)}\cos \; \theta_{i}}},{and}} & \left( {28a} \right) \\ {{{E_{\rho}\left( {\rho,z} \right)} = {{{E\left( {\rho,z} \right)}{\cos \left( {\frac{\pi}{2} - \theta_{i}} \right)}} = {{E\left( {\rho,z} \right)}\sin \; \theta_{i}}}},} & \left( {28b} \right) \end{matrix}$

which means that the field ratio is

$\begin{matrix} {\frac{E_{\rho}}{E_{z}} = {\frac{1}{\tan \; \theta_{i}} = {\tan \; {\psi_{i}.}}}} & (29) \end{matrix}$

A generalized parameter W, called “wave tilt,” is noted herein as the ratio of the horizontal electric field component to the vertical electric field component given by

$\begin{matrix} {{W = {\frac{E_{\rho}}{E_{z}} = {{W}^{j\; \Psi}}}},{or}} & \left( {30a} \right) \\ {{\frac{1}{W} = {\frac{E_{z}}{E_{\rho}} = {{\tan \; \theta_{i}} = {\frac{1}{W}^{{- j}\; \Psi}}}}},} & \left( {30b} \right) \end{matrix}$

which is complex and has both magnitude and phase. For an electromagnetic wave in Region 2, the wave tilt angle (Ψ) is equal to the angle between the normal of the wave-front at the boundary interface with Region 1 and the tangent to the boundary interface. This may be easier to see in FIG. 5B, which illustrates equi-phase surfaces of an electromagnetic wave and their normals for a radial cylindrical guided surface wave. At the boundary interface (z=0) with a perfect conductor, the wave-front normal is parallel to the tangent of the boundary interface, resulting in W=0. However, in the case of a lossy dielectric, a wave tilt W exists because the wave-front normal is not parallel with the tangent of the boundary interface at z=0.

Applying Equation (30b) to a guided surface wave gives

$\begin{matrix} {{\tan \; \theta_{{i,B}\;}} = {\frac{E_{z}}{E_{\rho}} = {\frac{u_{2}}{\gamma} = {\sqrt{ɛ_{r} - {j\; x}} = {n = {\frac{1}{W} = {\frac{1}{W}{^{{- j}\; \Psi}.}}}}}}}} & (31) \end{matrix}$

With the angle of incidence equal to the complex Brewster angle (θ_(i,B)), the Fresnel reflection coefficient of Equation (25) vanishes, as shown by

$\begin{matrix} {{{{\Gamma_{||}\left( \theta_{i,B} \right)} = \frac{\sqrt{\left( {ɛ_{r} - {j\; x}} \right) - {\sin^{2}\theta_{i}}} - {\left( {ɛ_{r} - {j\; x}} \right)\cos \; \theta_{i}}}{\sqrt{\left( {ɛ_{r} - {j\; x}} \right) - {\sin^{2}\theta_{i}}} + {\left( {ɛ_{r} - {j\; x}} \right)\cos \; \theta_{i}}}}}_{\theta_{i} = \theta_{i,B}} = 0.} & (32) \end{matrix}$

By adjusting the complex field ratio of Equation (22), an incident field can be synthesized to be incident at a complex angle at which the reflection is reduced or eliminated. Establishing this ratio as n=√{square root over (∈_(r)−jx)} results in the synthesized electric field being incident at the complex Brewster angle, making the reflections vanish.

The concept of an electrical effective height can provide further insight into synthesizing an electric field with a complex angle of incidence with a guided surface waveguide probe 300. The electrical effective height (h_(eff)) has been defined as

$\begin{matrix} {h_{eff} = {\frac{1}{I_{0\;}}{\int_{0}^{h_{p}}{{I(z)}{z}}}}} & (33) \end{matrix}$

for a monopole with a physical height (or length) of h_(p). Since the expression depends upon the magnitude and phase of the source distribution along the structure, the effective height (or length) is complex in general. The integration of the distributed current I(z) of the structure is performed over the physical height of the structure (h_(p)), and normalized to the ground current (I₀) flowing upward through the base (or input) of the structure. The distributed current along the structure can be expressed by

I(z)=I _(C) cos(β₀ z),  (34)

where β₀ is the propagation factor for current propagating on the structure. In the example of FIG. 3, I_(C) is the current that is distributed along the vertical structure of the guided surface waveguide probe 300 a.

For example, consider a feed network 309 that includes a low loss coil (e.g., a helical coil) at the bottom of the structure and a vertical feed line conductor connected between the coil and the charge terminal T₁. The phase delay due to the coil (or helical delay line) is θ_(c)=β_(p)l_(C), with a physical length of l_(C) and a propagation factor of

$\begin{matrix} {{\beta_{p} = {\frac{2\pi}{\lambda_{p}\;} = \frac{2\pi}{V_{f}\lambda_{0}}}},} & (35) \end{matrix}$

where V_(f) is the velocity factor on the structure, λ₀ is the wavelength at the supplied frequency, and λ_(p) is the propagation wavelength resulting from the velocity factor V_(f). The phase delay is measured relative to the ground (stake) current I₀.

In addition, the spatial phase delay along the length l_(w) of the vertical feed line conductor can be given by θ_(y)=β_(w)l_(w) where β_(w) is the propagation phase constant for the vertical feed line conductor. In some implementations, the spatial phase delay may be approximated by θ_(y)=β_(w)h_(p), since the difference between the physical height h_(p) of the guided surface waveguide probe 300 a and the vertical feed line conductor length l_(w) is much less than a wavelength at the supplied frequency (λ₀). As a result, the total phase delay through the coil and vertical feed line conductor is Φ=θ_(c)+θ_(y), and the current fed to the top of the coil from the bottom of the physical structure is

I _(C)(θ_(c)+θ_(y))=I ₀ e ^(jΦ,)  (36)

with the total phase delay D measured relative to the ground (stake) current I₀. Consequently, the electrical effective height of a guided surface waveguide probe 300 can be approximated by

$\begin{matrix} {{h_{eff} = {{\frac{1}{I_{0}}{\int_{0}^{h_{p}}{I_{0}^{j\; \Phi}{\cos \left( {\beta_{0}z} \right)}{z}}}} \cong {h_{p}^{j\; \Phi}}}},} & (37) \end{matrix}$

for the case where the physical height h_(p)<<λ₀. The complex effective height of a monopole, h_(eff)=h_(p) at an angle (or phase shift) of Φ, may be adjusted to cause the source fields to match a guided surface waveguide mode and cause a guided surface wave to be launched on the lossy conducting medium 303.

In the example of FIG. 5A, ray optics are used to illustrate the complex angle trigonometry of the incident electric field (E) having a complex Brewster angle of incidence (θ_(i,B)) at the Hankel crossover distance (R_(x)) 315. Recall from Equation (26) that, for a lossy conducting medium, the Brewster angle is complex and specified by

$\begin{matrix} {{\tan \; \theta_{i,B}} = {\sqrt{ɛ_{r} - {j\; \frac{\sigma}{\omega \; ɛ_{o}}}} = {n.}}} & (38) \end{matrix}$

Electrically, the geometric parameters are related by the electrical effective height (h_(eff)) of the charge terminal T₁ by

R _(x) tan ψ_(i,B) =R _(x) ×W=h _(eff) =h _(p) e ^(jΦ,)  (39)

where ψ_(i,B)=(π/2)−θ_(i,B) is the Brewster angle measured from the surface of the lossy conducting medium. To couple into the guided surface waveguide mode, the wave tilt of the electric field at the Hankel crossover distance can be expressed as the ratio of the electrical effective height and the Hankel crossover distance

$\begin{matrix} {\frac{h_{eff}}{R_{x}} = {{\tan \; \psi_{i,B}} = {W_{Rx}.}}} & (40) \end{matrix}$

Since both the physical height (h_(p)) and the Hankel crossover distance (R_(x)) are real quantities, the angle (Ψ) of the desired guided surface wave tilt at the Hankel crossover distance (R_(x)) is equal to the phase (Φ) of the complex effective height (h_(eff)). This implies that by varying the phase at the supply point of the coil, and thus the phase shift in Equation (37), the phase, Φ, of the complex effective height can be manipulated to match the angle of the wave tilt, Ψ, of the guided surface waveguide mode at the Hankel crossover point 315: Φ=Ψ.

In FIG. 5A, a right triangle is depicted having an adjacent side of length R_(x) along the lossy conducting medium surface and a complex Brewster angle ψ_(i,B) measured between a ray 316 extending between the Hankel crossover point 315 at R_(x) and the center of the charge terminal T₁, and the lossy conducting medium surface 317 between the Hankel crossover point 315 and the charge terminal T₁. With the charge terminal T₁ positioned at physical height h_(p) and excited with a charge having the appropriate phase delay Φ, the resulting electric field is incident with the lossy conducting medium boundary interface at the Hankel crossover distance R_(x), and at the Brewster angle. Under these conditions, the guided surface waveguide mode can be excited without reflection or substantially negligible reflection.

If the physical height of the charge terminal T₁ is decreased without changing the phase shift D of the effective height (h_(eff)), the resulting electric field intersects the lossy conducting medium 303 at the Brewster angle at a reduced distance from the guided surface waveguide probe 300. FIG. 6 graphically illustrates the effect of decreasing the physical height of the charge terminal T₁ on the distance where the electric field is incident at the Brewster angle. As the height is decreased from h₃ through h₂ to h₁, the point where the electric field intersects with the lossy conducting medium (e.g., the earth) at the Brewster angle moves closer to the charge terminal position. However, as Equation (39) indicates, the height H₁ (FIG. 3) of the charge terminal T₁ should be at or higher than the physical height (h_(p)) in order to excite the far-out component of the Hankel function. With the charge terminal T₁ positioned at or above the effective height (h_(eff)), the lossy conducting medium 303 can be illuminated at the Brewster angle of incidence (ψ_(i,B)=(π/2)−θ_(i,B)) at or beyond the Hankel crossover distance (R_(x)) 315 as illustrated in FIG. 5A. To reduce or minimize the bound charge on the charge terminal T₁, the height should be at least four times the spherical diameter (or equivalent spherical diameter) of the charge terminal T₁ as mentioned above.

A guided surface waveguide probe 300 can be configured to establish an electric field having a wave tilt that corresponds to a wave illuminating the surface of the lossy conducting medium 303 at a complex Brewster angle, thereby exciting radial surface currents by substantially mode-matching to a guided surface wave mode at (or beyond) the Hankel crossover point 315 at R_(x). Referring to FIG. 7, shown is a graphical representation of an example of a guided surface waveguide probe 300 b that includes a charge terminal T₁. An AC source 712 acts as the excitation source (312 of FIG. 3) for the charge terminal T₁, which is coupled to the guided surface waveguide probe 300 b through a feed network (309 of FIG. 3) comprising a coil 709 such as, e.g., a helical coil. In other implementations, the AC source 712 can be inductively coupled to the coil 709 through a primary coil. In some embodiments, an impedance matching network may be included to improve and/or maximize coupling of the AC source 712 to the coil 709.

As shown in FIG. 7, the guided surface waveguide probe 300 b can include the upper charge terminal T₁ (e.g., a sphere at height h_(p)) that is positioned along a vertical axis z that is substantially normal to the plane presented by the lossy conducting medium 303. A second medium 306 is located above the lossy conducting medium 303. The charge terminal T₁ has a self-capacitance C_(T). During operation, charge Q₁ is imposed on the terminal T₁ depending on the voltage applied to the terminal T₁ at any given instant.

In the example of FIG. 7, the coil 709 is coupled to a ground stake 715 at a first end and to the charge terminal T₁ via a vertical feed line conductor 718. In some implementations, the coil connection to the charge terminal T₁ can be adjusted using a tap 721 of the coil 709 as shown in FIG. 7. The coil 709 can be energized at an operating frequency by the AC source 712 through a tap 724 at a lower portion of the coil 709. In other implementations, the AC source 712 can be inductively coupled to the coil 709 through a primary coil.

The construction and adjustment of the guided surface waveguide probe 300 is based upon various operating conditions, such as the transmission frequency, conditions of the lossy conducting medium (e.g., soil conductivity a and relative permittivity ∈_(r)), and size of the charge terminal T₁. The index of refraction can be calculated from Equations (10) and (11) as

n=√{square root over (∈_(r) −jx)},  (41)

where x=σ/ω∈_(o) with ω=2πf. The conductivity a and relative permittivity ∈_(r) can be determined through test measurements of the lossy conducting medium 303. The complex Brewster angle (θ_(i,B)) measured from the surface normal can also be determined from Equation (26) as

θ_(i,B)=arctan(√{square root over (∈_(r) −jx)}),  (42)

or measured from the surface as shown in FIG. 5A as

$\begin{matrix} {\psi_{i,B} = {\frac{\pi}{2} - {\theta_{i,B}.}}} & (43) \end{matrix}$

The wave tilt at the Hankel crossover distance (w_(Rx)) can also be found using Equation (40).

The Hankel crossover distance can also be found by equating the magnitudes of Equations (20b) and (21) for −jγρ, and solving for R_(x) as illustrated by FIG. 4. The electrical effective height can then be determined from Equation (39) using the Hankel crossover distance and the complex Brewster angle as

h _(eff) =h _(p) e ^(jΦ) =R _(x) tan ψ_(i,B)  (44)

As can be seen from Equation (44), the complex effective height (h_(eff)) includes a magnitude that is associated with the physical height (h_(p)) of the charge terminal T₁ and a phase delay (Φ) that is to be associated with the angle (Ψ) of the wave tilt at the Hankel crossover distance (R_(x)). With these variables and the selected charge terminal T₁ configuration, it is possible to determine the configuration of a guided surface waveguide probe 300.

With the charge terminal T₁ positioned at or above the physical height (h_(p)), the feed network (309 of FIG. 3) and/or the vertical feed line connecting the feed network to the charge terminal T₁ can be adjusted to match the phase (Φ) of the charge Q₁ on the charge terminal T₁ to the angle (Ψ) of the wave tilt (W). The size of the charge terminal T₁ can be chosen to provide a sufficiently large surface for the charge Q₁ imposed on the terminals. In general, it is desirable to make the charge terminal T₁ as large as practical. The size of the charge terminal T₁ should be large enough to avoid ionization of the surrounding air, which can result in electrical discharge or sparking around the charge terminal.

The phase delay θ_(c) of a helically-wound coil can be determined from Maxwell's equations as has been discussed by Corum, K. L. and J. F. Corum, “RF Coils, Helical Resonators and Voltage Magnification by Coherent Spatial Modes,” Microwave Review, Vol. 7, No. 2, September 2001, pp. 36-45., which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. For a helical coil with H/D>1, the ratio of the velocity of propagation (v) of a wave along the coil's longitudinal axis to the speed of light (c), or the “velocity factor,” is given by

$\begin{matrix} {{V_{f} = {\frac{\upsilon}{c} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 + {20\left( \frac{D}{s} \right)^{2.5}\left( \frac{D}{\lambda_{o}} \right)^{0.5}}}}}},} & (45) \end{matrix}$

where H is the axial length of the solenoidal helix, D is the coil diameter, N is the number of turns of the coil, s=H/N is the turn-to-turn spacing (or helix pitch) of the coil, and λ_(o) is the free-space wavelength. Based upon this relationship, the electrical length, or phase delay, of the helical coil is given by

$\begin{matrix} {\theta_{c} = {{\beta_{p}H} = {{\frac{2\pi}{\lambda_{p}}H} = {\frac{2\pi}{V_{f}\lambda_{0}}{H.}}}}} & (46) \end{matrix}$

The principle is the same if the helix is wound spirally or is short and fat, but V_(f) and θ_(c) are easier to obtain by experimental measurement. The expression for the characteristic (wave) impedance of a helical transmission line has also been derived as

$\begin{matrix} {Z_{c} = {{\frac{60}{V_{f}}\left\lbrack {{\; {n\left( \frac{V_{f}\lambda_{0}}{D} \right)}} - 1.027} \right\rbrack}.}} & (47) \end{matrix}$

The spatial phase delay θ_(y) of the structure can be determined using the traveling wave phase delay of the vertical feed line conductor 718 (FIG. 7). The capacitance of a cylindrical vertical conductor above a prefect ground plane can be expressed as

$\begin{matrix} {{C_{A} = {\frac{2{\pi ɛ}_{o}h_{w}}{{\; {n\left( \frac{h}{a} \right)}} - 1}{Farads}}},} & (48) \end{matrix}$

where h_(w) is the vertical length (or height) of the conductor and a is the radius (in mks units). As with the helical coil, the traveling wave phase delay of the vertical feed line conductor can be given by

$\begin{matrix} {{\theta_{y} = {{\beta_{w}h_{w}} = {{\frac{2\pi}{\lambda_{w}}h_{w}} = {\frac{2\pi}{V_{w}\lambda_{0}}h_{w}}}}},} & (49) \end{matrix}$

where β_(w) is the propagation phase constant for the vertical feed line conductor, h_(w) is the vertical length (or height) of the vertical feed line conductor, V_(w) is the velocity factor on the wire, λ₀ is the wavelength at the supplied frequency, and λ_(W) is the propagation wavelength resulting from the velocity factor V_(w). For a uniform cylindrical conductor, the velocity factor is a constant with V_(w)≈0.94, or in a range from about 0.93 to about 0.98. If the mast is considered to be a uniform transmission line, its average characteristic impedance can be approximated by

$\begin{matrix} {{Z_{w} = {\frac{60}{V_{w}}\left\lbrack {{\; {n\left( \frac{h_{w}}{a} \right)}} - 1} \right\rbrack}},} & (50) \end{matrix}$

where V_(w)≈0.94 for a uniform cylindrical conductor and a is the radius of the conductor. An alternative expression that has been employed in amateur radio literature for the characteristic impedance of a single-wire feed line can be given by

$\begin{matrix} {Z_{w} = {138\mspace{14mu} {{\log \left( \frac{1.123\mspace{14mu} V_{w}\lambda_{0}}{2\pi \; a} \right)}.}}} & (51) \end{matrix}$

Equation (51) implies that Z_(o) for a single-wire feeder varies with frequency. The phase delay can be determined based upon the capacitance and characteristic impedance.

With a charge terminal T₁ positioned over the lossy conducting medium 303 as shown in FIG. 3, the feed network 309 can be adjusted to excite the charge terminal T₁ with the phase shift (Φ) of the complex effective height (h_(eff)) equal to the angle (Ψ) of the wave tilt at the Hankel crossover distance, or Φ=Ψ. When this condition is met, the electric field produced by the charge oscillating Q₁ on the charge terminal T₁ is coupled into a guided surface waveguide mode traveling along the surface of a lossy conducting medium 303. For example, if the Brewster angle (θ_(i,B)), the phase delay (θ_(y)) associated with the vertical feed line conductor 718 (FIG. 7), and the configuration of the coil 709 (FIG. 7) are known, then the position of the tap 721 (FIG. 7) can be determined and adjusted to impose an oscillating charge Q₁ on the charge terminal T₁ with phase Φ=Ψ. The position of the tap 721 may be adjusted to maximize coupling the traveling surface waves into the guided surface waveguide mode. Excess coil length beyond the position of the tap 721 can be removed to reduce the capacitive effects. The vertical wire height and/or the geometrical parameters of the helical coil may also be varied.

The coupling to the guided surface waveguide mode on the surface of the lossy conducting medium 303 can be improved and/or optimized by tuning the guided surface waveguide probe 300 for standing wave resonance with respect to a complex image plane associated with the charge Q₁ on the charge terminal T₁. By doing this, the performance of the guided surface waveguide probe 300 can be adjusted for increased and/or maximum voltage (and thus charge Q₁) on the charge terminal T₁. Referring back to FIG. 3, the effect of the lossy conducting medium 303 in Region 1 can be examined using image theory analysis.

Physically, an elevated charge Q₁ placed over a perfectly conducting plane attracts the free charge on the perfectly conducting plane, which then “piles up” in the region under the elevated charge Q₁. The resulting distribution of “bound” electricity on the perfectly conducting plane is similar to a bell-shaped curve. The superposition of the potential of the elevated charge Q₁, plus the potential of the induced “piled up” charge beneath it, forces a zero equipotential surface for the perfectly conducting plane. The boundary value problem solution that describes the fields in the region above the perfectly conducting plane may be obtained using the classical notion of image charges, where the field from the elevated charge is superimposed with the field from a corresponding “image” charge below the perfectly conducting plane.

This analysis may also be used with respect to a lossy conducting medium 303 by assuming the presence of an effective image charge Q₁′ beneath the guided surface waveguide probe 300. The effective image charge Q₁′ coincides with the charge Q₁ on the charge terminal T₁ about a conducting image ground plane 318, as illustrated in FIG. 3. However, the image charge Q₁′ is not merely located at some real depth and 180° out of phase with the primary source charge Q₁ on the charge terminal T₁, as they would be in the case of a perfect conductor. Rather, the lossy conducting medium 303 (e.g., a terrestrial medium) presents a phase shifted image. That is to say, the image charge Q₁′ is at a complex depth below the surface (or physical boundary) of the lossy conducting medium 303. For a discussion of complex image depth, reference is made to Wait, J. R., “Complex Image Theory—Revisited,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Vol. 33, No. 4, August 1991, pp. 27-29, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Instead of the image charge Q₁′ being at a depth that is equal to the physical height (H₁) of the charge Q₁, the conducting image ground plane 318 (representing a perfect conductor) is located at a complex depth of z=−d/2 and the image charge Q₁′ appears at a complex depth (i.e., the “depth” has both magnitude and phase), given by −D₁=−(d/2+d/2+H₁)≠H₁. For vertically polarized sources over the earth,

$\begin{matrix} {{d = {{\frac{\sqrt[2]{\gamma_{e}^{2} + k_{0}^{2}}}{\gamma_{e}^{2}} \approx \frac{2}{\gamma_{e}}} = {{d_{r} + {jd}_{i}} = \left| d \middle| {\angle\zeta} \right.}}},} & (52) \end{matrix}$

where

γ_(e) ² =jωμ ₁σ₁−ω²μ₁∈₁, and  (53)

k _(o)=ω√{square root over (μ_(o)∈_(o))}.  (54)

as indicated in Equation (12). The complex spacing of the image charge, in turn, implies that the external field will experience extra phase shifts not encountered when the interface is either a dielectric or a perfect conductor. In the lossy conducting medium, the wave front normal is parallel to the tangent of the conducting image ground plane 318 at z=−d/2, and not at the boundary interface between Regions 1 and 2.

Consider the case illustrated in FIG. 8A where the lossy conducting medium 303 is a finitely conducting earth 803 with a physical boundary 806. The finitely conducting earth 803 may be replaced by a perfectly conducting image ground plane 809 as shown in FIG. 8B, which is located at a complex depth z₁ below the physical boundary 806. This equivalent representation exhibits the same impedance when looking down into the interface at the physical boundary 806. The equivalent representation of FIG. 8B can be modeled as an equivalent transmission line, as shown in FIG. 8C. The cross-section of the equivalent structure is represented as a (z-directed) end-loaded transmission line, with the impedance of the perfectly conducting image plane being a short circuit (z_(s)=0). The depth z₁ can be determined by equating the TEM wave impedance looking down at the earth to an image ground plane impedance z_(in) seen looking into the transmission line of FIG. 8C.

In the case of FIG. 8A, the propagation constant and wave intrinsic impedance in the upper region (air) 812 are

γ_(o)=ω√{square root over (μ_(o)∈_(o))}=0jβ _(o), and  (55)

$\begin{matrix} {z_{o} = {\frac{j\; {\omega\mu}_{o}}{\gamma_{o}} = {\sqrt{\frac{\mu_{o}}{ɛ_{o}}}.}}} & (56) \end{matrix}$

In the lossy earth 803, the propagation constant and wave intrinsic impedance are

$\begin{matrix} {{\gamma_{e} = \sqrt{j\; {{\omega\mu}_{1}\left( {\sigma_{1} + {j\; {\omega ɛ}_{1}}} \right)}}},{and}} & (57) \\ {Z_{e} = {\frac{j\; {\omega\mu}_{1}}{\gamma_{e}}.}} & (58) \end{matrix}$

For normal incidence, the equivalent representation of FIG. 8B is equivalent to a TEM transmission line whose characteristic impedance is that of air (z_(o)), with propagation constant of γ_(o), and whose length is z₁. As such, the image ground plane impedance Z_(in) seen at the interface for the shorted transmission line of FIG. 8C is given by

Z _(in) =Z _(o) tan h(γ_(o) z ₁).  (59)

Equating the image ground plane impedance Z_(in) associated with the equivalent model of FIG. 8C to the normal incidence wave impedance of FIG. 8A and solving for z₁ gives the distance to a short circuit (the perfectly conducting image ground plane 809) as

$\begin{matrix} {{Z_{1} = {{\frac{1}{\gamma_{o}}{\tanh^{- 1}\left( \frac{Z_{e}}{Z_{o}} \right)}} = {{\frac{1}{\gamma_{o}}{\tanh^{- 1}\left( \frac{\gamma_{o}}{\gamma_{e}} \right)}} \approx \frac{1}{\gamma_{e}}}}},} & (60) \end{matrix}$

where only the first term of the series expansion for the inverse hyperbolic tangent is considered for this approximation. Note that in the air region 812, the propagation constant is γ_(o)=jβ_(o), so Z_(in)=jZ_(o) tan β_(o)z₁ (which is a purely imaginary quantity for a real z₁), but z_(e) is a complex value if σ≠0. Therefore, Z_(in)=Z_(e) only when z₁ is a complex distance.

Since the equivalent representation of FIG. 8B includes a perfectly conducting image ground plane 809, the image depth for a charge or current lying at the surface of the earth (physical boundary 806) is equal to distance z₁ on the other side of the image ground plane 809, or d=2×z₁ beneath the earth's surface (which is located at z=0). Thus, the distance to the perfectly conducting image ground plane 809 can be approximated by

$\begin{matrix} {d = {{2z_{1}} \approx {\frac{2}{\gamma_{e}}.}}} & (61) \end{matrix}$

Additionally, the “image charge” will be “equal and opposite” to the real charge, so the potential of the perfectly conducting image ground plane 809 at depth z₁=−d/2 will be zero.

If a charge Q₁ is elevated a distance H₁ above the surface of the earth as illustrated in FIG. 3, then the image charge Q₁′ resides at a complex distance of D₁=d+H₁ below the surface, or a complex distance of d/2+H₁ below the image ground plane 318. The guided surface waveguide probe 300 b of FIG. 7 can be modeled as an equivalent single-wire transmission line image plane model that can be based upon the perfectly conducting image ground plane 809 of FIG. 8B. FIG. 9A shows an example of the equivalent single-wire transmission line image plane model and FIG. 9B illustrates an example of the equivalent classic transmission line model, including the shorted transmission line of FIG. 8C.

In the equivalent image plane models of FIGS. 9A and 9B, Φ=θ_(y)+θ_(c) is the traveling wave phase delay of the guided surface waveguide probe 300 referenced to earth (or the lossy conducting medium 303), θ_(c)=β_(p)H is the electrical length of the coil 709 (FIG. 7), of physical length H, expressed in degrees, θ_(y)=β_(w)h_(w) is the electrical length of the vertical feed line conductor 718 (FIG. 7), of physical length h_(w), expressed in degrees, and θ_(d)=β_(o) d/2 is the phase shift between the image ground plane 809 and the physical boundary 806 of the earth (or lossy conducting medium 303). In the example of FIGS. 9A and 9B, Z_(w) is the characteristic impedance of the elevated vertical feed line conductor 718 in ohms, Z_(c) is the characteristic impedance of the coil 709 in ohms, and Z_(o) is the characteristic impedance of free space.

At the base of the guided surface waveguide probe 300, the impedance seen “looking up” into the structure is Z_(↑)=Z_(base). With a load impedance of:

$\begin{matrix} {{Z_{L} = \frac{1}{j\; \omega \; C_{T}}},} & (62) \end{matrix}$

where C_(T) is the self-capacitance of the charge terminal T₁, the impedance seen “looking up” into the vertical feed line conductor 718 (FIG. 7) is given by:

$\begin{matrix} {{Z_{2} = {{Z_{W}\frac{Z_{L} + {Z_{w}\mspace{14mu} {\tanh \left( {j\; \beta_{w}h_{w}} \right)}}}{Z_{w} + {Z_{L}\mspace{14mu} {\tanh \left( {j\; \beta_{w}h_{w}} \right)}}}} = {Z_{W}\frac{Z_{L} + {Z_{w}\mspace{14mu} {\tanh \left( {j\; \theta_{y}} \right)}}}{Z_{w} + {Z_{L}\mspace{14mu} {\tanh \left( {j\; \theta_{y}} \right)}}}}}},} & (63) \end{matrix}$

and the impedance seen “looking up” into the coil 709 (FIG. 7) is given by:

$\begin{matrix} {Z_{base} = {{Z_{C}\frac{Z_{2} + {Z_{c}\mspace{14mu} {\tanh \left( {j\; \beta_{p}H} \right)}}}{Z_{c} + {Z_{2}\mspace{14mu} {\tanh \left( {j\; \beta_{p}H} \right)}}}} = {Z_{C}{\frac{Z_{2} + {Z_{c}\mspace{14mu} {\tanh \left( {j\; \theta_{c}} \right)}}}{Z_{c} + {Z_{2}\mspace{14mu} {\tanh \left( {j\; \theta_{c}} \right)}}}.}}}} & (64) \end{matrix}$

At the base of the guided surface waveguide probe 300, the impedance seen “looking down” into the lossy conducting medium 303 is Z_(↓)=Z_(in), which is given by:

$\begin{matrix} {{Z_{in} = {{Z_{O}\frac{Z_{s} + {Z_{o}\mspace{14mu} {\tanh \left\lbrack {j\; {\beta_{o}\left( {d\text{/}2} \right)}} \right\rbrack}}}{Z_{o} + {Z_{s}\mspace{14mu} {\tanh \left\lbrack {j\; {\beta_{o}\left( {d\text{/}2} \right)}} \right\rbrack}}}} = {Z_{o}\mspace{14mu} {\tanh \left( {j\; \theta_{d}} \right)}}}},} & (65) \end{matrix}$

where Z_(s)=0.

Neglecting losses, the equivalent image plane model can be tuned to resonance when Z_(↓)+Z^(↑)=0 at the physical boundary 806. Or, in the low loss case, X_(↓)+X_(↑)=0 at the physical boundary 806, where X is the corresponding reactive component. Thus, the impedance at the physical boundary 806 “looking up” into the guided surface waveguide probe 300 is the conjugate of the impedance at the physical boundary 806 “looking down” into the lossy conducting medium 303. By adjusting the load impedance Z_(L) of the charge terminal T₁ while maintaining the traveling wave phase delay Φ equal to the angle of the media's wave tilt Ψ, so that Φ=Ψ, which improves and/or maximizes coupling of the probe's electric field to a guided surface waveguide mode along the surface of the lossy conducting medium 303 (e.g., earth), the equivalent image plane models of FIGS. 9A and 9B can be tuned to resonance with respect to the image ground plane 809. In this way, the impedance of the equivalent complex image plane model is purely resistive, which maintains a superposed standing wave on the probe structure that maximizes the voltage and elevated charge on terminal T₁, and by equations (1)-(3) and (16) maximizes the propagating surface wave.

It follows from the Hankel solutions, that the guided surface wave excited by the guided surface waveguide probe 300 is an outward propagating traveling wave. The source distribution along the feed network 309 between the charge terminal T₁ and the ground stake 715 of the guided surface waveguide probe 300 (FIGS. 3 and 7) is actually composed of a superposition of a traveling wave plus a standing wave on the structure. With the charge terminal T₁ positioned at or above the physical height h_(p), the phase delay of the traveling wave moving through the feed network 309 is matched to the angle of the wave tilt associated with the lossy conducting medium 303. This mode-matching allows the traveling wave to be launched along the lossy conducting medium 303. Once the phase delay has been established for the traveling wave, the load impedance Z_(L) of the charge terminal T₁ is adjusted to bring the probe structure into standing wave resonance with respect to the image ground plane (318 of FIG. 3 or 809 of FIG. 8), which is at a complex depth of −d/2. In that case, the impedance seen from the image ground plane has zero reactance and the charge on the charge terminal T₁ is maximized.

The distinction between the traveling wave phenomenon and standing wave phenomena is that (1) the phase delay of traveling waves (θ=βd) on a section of transmission line of length d (sometimes called a “delay line”) is due to propagation time delays; whereas (2) the position-dependent phase of standing waves (which are composed of forward and backward propagating waves) depends on both the line length propagation time delay and impedance transitions at interfaces between line sections of different characteristic impedances. In addition to the phase delay that arises due to the physical length of a section of transmission line operating in sinusoidal steady-state, there is an extra reflection coefficient phase at impedance discontinuities that is due to the ratio of Z_(oa)/Z_(ob), where Z_(oa) and Z_(ob) are the characteristic impedances of two sections of a transmission line such as, e.g., a helical coil section of characteristic impedance Z_(oa)=Z_(c) (FIG. 9B) and a straight section of vertical feed line conductor of characteristic impedance Z_(ob)=Z_(w) (FIG. 9B). The effect of such discontinuous phase jumps can be seen in the Smith chart plots in FIG. 12.

As a result of this phenomenon, two relatively short transmission line sections of widely differing characteristic impedance may be used to provide a very large phase shift. For example, a probe structure composed of two sections of transmission line, one of low impedance and one of high impedance, together totaling a physical length of, say, 0.05λ, may be fabricated to provide a phase shift of 90° which is equivalent to a 0.25λ resonance. This is due to the large jump in characteristic impedances. In this way, a physically short probe structure can be electrically longer than the two physical lengths combined. This is illustrated in FIGS. 9A and 9B, but is especially clear in FIG. 12 where the discontinuities in the impedance ratios provide large jumps in phase between the different plotted sections on the Smith chart. The impedance discontinuity provides a substantial phase shift where the sections are joined together.

Referring to FIG. 10, shown is a flow chart illustrating an example of adjusting a guided surface waveguide probe 300 (FIG. 3) to substantially mode-match to a guided surface waveguide mode on the surface of the lossy conducting medium, which launches a guided surface traveling wave along the surface of a lossy conducting medium 303 (FIG. 3). Beginning with 1003, the charge terminal T₁ of the guided surface waveguide probe 300 is positioned at a defined height above a lossy conducting medium 303. Utilizing the characteristics of the lossy conducting medium 303 and the operating frequency of the guided surface waveguide probe 300, the Hankel crossover distance can also be found by equating the magnitudes of Equations (20b) and (21) for −jγρ, and solving for R_(x) as illustrated by FIG. 4. The complex index of refraction (n) can be determined using Equation (41) and the complex Brewster angle (θ_(i,B)) can then be determined from Equation (42). The physical height (h_(p)) of the charge terminal T₁ can then be determined from Equation (44). The charge terminal T₁ should be at or higher than the physical height (h_(p)) in order to excite the far-out component of the Hankel function. This height relationship is initially considered when launching surface waves. To reduce or minimize the bound charge on the charge terminal T₁, the height should be at least four times the spherical diameter (or equivalent spherical diameter) of the charge terminal T₁.

At 1006, the electrical phase delay D of the elevated charge Q₁ on the charge terminal T₁ is matched to the complex wave tilt angle Ψ. The phase delay (θ_(c)) of the helical coil and/or the phase delay (θ_(y)) of the vertical feed line conductor can be adjusted to make Φ equal to the angle (Ψ) of the wave tilt (W). Based on Equation (31), the angle (Ψ) of the wave tilt can be determined from:

$\begin{matrix} {W = {\frac{E_{\rho}}{E_{z}} = {\frac{1}{\tan \mspace{14mu} \theta_{i,B}} = {\frac{1}{n} = \left| W \middle| {^{j\; \Psi}.} \right.}}}} & (66) \end{matrix}$

The electrical phase Φ can then be matched to the angle of the wave tilt. This angular (or phase) relationship is next considered when launching surface waves. For example, the electrical phase delay Φ=θ_(c)+θ_(y) can be adjusted by varying the geometrical parameters of the coil 709 (FIG. 7) and/or the length (or height) of the vertical feed line conductor 718 (FIG. 7). By matching Φ=Ψ, an electric field can be established at or beyond the Hankel crossover distance (R_(x)) with a complex Brewster angle at the boundary interface to excite the surface waveguide mode and launch a traveling wave along the lossy conducting medium 303.

Next at 1009, the load impedance of the charge terminal T₁ is tuned to resonate the equivalent image plane model of the guided surface waveguide probe 300. The depth (d/2) of the conducting image ground plane 809 (or 318 of FIG. 3) can be determined using Equations (52), (53) and (54) and the values of the lossy conducting medium 303 (e.g., the earth), which can be measured. Using that depth, the phase shift (θ_(d)) between the image ground plane 809 and the physical boundary 806 of the lossy conducting medium 303 can be determined using θ_(d)=β_(o) d/2. The impedance (Z_(in)) as seen “looking down” into the lossy conducting medium 303 can then be determined using Equation (65). This resonance relationship can be considered to maximize the launched surface waves.

Based upon the adjusted parameters of the coil 709 and the length of the vertical feed line conductor 718, the velocity factor, phase delay, and impedance of the coil 709 and vertical feed line conductor 718 can be determined using Equations (45) through (51). In addition, the self-capacitance (C_(T)) of the charge terminal T₁ can be determined using, e.g., Equation (24). The propagation factor (β_(p)) of the coil 709 can be determined using Equation (35) and the propagation phase constant (β_(w)) for the vertical feed line conductor 718 can be determined using Equation (49). Using the self-capacitance and the determined values of the coil 709 and vertical feed line conductor 718, the impedance (Z_(base)) of the guided surface waveguide probe 300 as seen “looking up” into the coil 709 can be determined using Equations (62), (63) and (64).

The equivalent image plane model of the guided surface waveguide probe 300 can be tuned to resonance by adjusting the load impedance Z_(L) such that the reactance component X_(base) of Z_(base) cancels out the reactance component X_(in) of Z_(in), or X_(base) X_(in)=0. Thus, the impedance at the physical boundary 806 “looking up” into the guided surface waveguide probe 300 is the conjugate of the impedance at the physical boundary 806 “looking down” into the lossy conducting medium 303. The load impedance Z_(L) can be adjusted by varying the capacitance (C_(T)) of the charge terminal T₁ without changing the electrical phase delay Φ=θ_(c)+θ_(y) of the charge terminal T₁. An iterative approach may be taken to tune the load impedance Z_(L) for resonance of the equivalent image plane model with respect to the conducting image ground plane 809 (or 318). In this way, the coupling of the electric field to a guided surface waveguide mode along the surface of the lossy conducting medium 303 (e.g., earth) can be improved and/or maximized.

This may be better understood by illustrating the situation with a numerical example. Consider a guided surface waveguide probe 300 comprising a top-loaded vertical stub of physical height h_(p) with a charge terminal T₁ at the top, where the charge terminal T₁ is excited through a helical coil and vertical feed line conductor at an operational frequency (f_(o)) of 1.85 MHz. With a height (H₁) of 16 feet and the lossy conducting medium 303 (i.e., earth) having a relative permittivity of ∈_(r)=15 and a conductivity of σ₁=0.010 mhos/m, several surface wave propagation parameters can be calculated for f_(o)=1.850 MHz. Under these conditions, the Hankel crossover distance can be found to be R_(x)=54.5 feet with a physical height of h_(p)=5.5 feet, which is well below the actual height of the charge terminal T₁. While a charge terminal height of H₁=5.5 feet could have been used, the taller probe structure reduced the bound capacitance, permitting a greater percentage of free charge on the charge terminal T₁ providing greater field strength and excitation of the traveling wave.

The wave length can be determined as:

$\begin{matrix} {{\lambda_{O} = {\frac{c}{f_{o}} = {162.162\mspace{14mu} {meters}}}},} & (67) \end{matrix}$

where c is the speed of light. The complex index of refraction is:

n=√{square root over (∈_(r) −jx)}=7.529−j6.546,  (68)

from Equation (41), where x=σ₁/ω∈_(o) with ω=2πf_(o), and the complex Brewster angle is:

θ_(i,B)=arctan(√{square root over (∈_(r) −jx)})=85.6−j3.744°.  (69)

from Equation (42). Using Equation (66), the wave tilt values can be determined to be:

$\begin{matrix} {W = {\frac{1}{\tan \mspace{14mu} \theta_{i,B}} = {\frac{1}{n} = {\left| W \middle| ^{j\; \Psi} \right. = {0.101{^{j\; 40.164{^\circ}}.}}}}}} & (70) \end{matrix}$

Thus, the helical coil can be adjusted to match Φ=Ψ=40.614°

The velocity factor of the vertical feed line conductor (approximated as a uniform cylindrical conductor with a diameter of 0.27 inches) can be given as V_(w)≈0.93. Since h_(p)<<λ_(o), the propagation phase constant for the vertical feed line conductor can be approximated as:

$\begin{matrix} {\beta_{w} = {\frac{2\pi}{\lambda_{w}} = {\frac{2\pi}{V_{w}\lambda_{0}} = {0.042\mspace{14mu} {m^{- 1}.}}}}} & (71) \end{matrix}$

From Equation (49) the phase delay of the vertical feed line conductor is:

θ_(y)=β_(w) h _(w)≈β_(w) h _(p)=11.640°.  (72)

By adjusting the phase delay of the helical coil so that θ_(c)=28.974°=40.614°−11.640°, Φ will equal Ψ to match the guided surface waveguide mode. To illustrate the relationship between Φ and Ψ FIG. 11 shows a plot of both over a range of frequencies. As both Φ and Ψ are frequency dependent, it can be seen that their respective curves cross over each other at approximately 1.85 MHz.

For a helical coil having a conductor diameter of 0.0881 inches, a coil diameter (D) of 30 inches and a turn-to-turn spacing (s) of 4 inches, the velocity factor for the coil can be determined using Equation (45) as:

$\begin{matrix} {{V_{f} = {\frac{1}{\sqrt{1 + {20\left( \frac{D}{s} \right)^{2.5}\left( \frac{D}{\lambda_{o}} \right)^{0.5}}}} = 0.069}},} & (73) \end{matrix}$

and the propagation factor from Equation (35) is:

$\begin{matrix} {\beta_{p} = {\frac{2\pi}{V_{f}\lambda_{0}} = {0.564\mspace{14mu} {m^{- 1}.}}}} & (74) \end{matrix}$

With θ_(c)=28.974°, the axial length of the solenoidal helix (H) can be determined using Equation (46) such that:

$\begin{matrix} {H = {\frac{\theta_{c}}{\beta_{p}} = {35.2732\mspace{14mu} {{inches}.}}}} & (75) \end{matrix}$

This height determines the location on the helical coil where the vertical feed line conductor is connected, resulting in a coil with 8.818 turns (N=H/s).

With the traveling wave phase delay of the coil and vertical feed line conductor adjusted to match the wave tilt angle (Φ=θ_(c)+θ_(y)=Ψ), the load impedance (Z_(L)) of the charge terminal T₁ can be adjusted for standing wave resonance of the equivalent image plane model of the guided surface wave probe 300. From the measured permittivity, conductivity and permeability of the earth, the radial propagation constant can be determined using Equation (57)

γ_(e)=√{square root over (jωu ₁(σ₁ +jω∈ ₁))}=0.25+j0.292 m ⁻¹,  (76)

And the complex depth of the conducting image ground plane can be approximated from Equation (52) as:

$\begin{matrix} {{{d \approx \frac{2}{\gamma_{e}}} = {3.364 + {j\; 3.963\mspace{14mu} {meters}}}},} & (77) \end{matrix}$

with a corresponding phase shift between the conducting image ground plane and the physical boundary of the earth given by:

θ_(d)=β_(o)(d/2)=4.015−j4.73°.  (78)

Using Equation (65), the impedance seen “looking down” into the lossy conducting medium 303 (i.e., earth) can be determined as:

Z _(in) =Z _(o) tan h(jθ _(d))=R _(in) +jX _(in)=31.191+j26.27 ohms.  (79)

By matching the reactive component (X_(in)) seen “looking down” into the lossy conducting medium 303 with the reactive component (X_(base)) seen “looking up” into the guided surface wave probe 300, the coupling into the guided surface waveguide mode may be maximized. This can be accomplished by adjusting the capacitance of the charge terminal T₁ without changing the traveling wave phase delays of the coil and vertical feed line conductor. For example, by adjusting the charge terminal capacitance (C_(T)) to 61.8126 pF, the load impedance from Equation (62) is:

$\begin{matrix} {{Z_{L} = {\frac{1}{j\; \omega \; C_{T}} = {{- j}\; 1392\mspace{14mu} {ohms}}}},} & (80) \end{matrix}$

and the reactive components at the boundary are matched.

Using Equation (51), the impedance of the vertical feed line conductor (having a diameter (2a) of 0.27 inches) is given as

$\begin{matrix} {{Z_{w} = {{138{\log \left( \frac{1.123\; V_{w}\lambda_{0}}{2\pi \; a} \right)}} = {537.534\mspace{14mu} {ohms}}}},} & (81) \end{matrix}$

and the impedance seen “looking up” into the vertical feed line conductor is given by Equation (63) as:

$\begin{matrix} {Z_{2} = {{Z_{W}\frac{Z_{L} + {Z_{w}{\tanh \left( {j\; \theta_{y}} \right)}}}{Z_{w} + {Z_{L}{\tanh \left( {j\; \theta_{y}} \right)}}}} = {{- j}\; 835.438\mspace{14mu} {{ohms}.}}}} & (82) \end{matrix}$

Using Equation (47), the characteristic impedance of the helical coil is given as

$\begin{matrix} {{Z_{c} = {{\frac{60}{V_{f}}\left\lbrack {{\; {n\left( \frac{V_{f}\lambda_{0}}{D} \right)}} - 1.027} \right\rbrack} = {1446\mspace{14mu} {ohms}}}},} & (83) \end{matrix}$

and the impedance seen “looking up” into the coil at the base is given by Equation (64) as:

$\begin{matrix} {Z_{base} = {{Z_{c}\frac{Z_{2} + {Z_{c}{\tanh \left( {j\; \theta_{c}} \right)}}}{Z_{c} + {Z_{2}{\tanh \left( {j\; \theta_{c}} \right)}}}} = {{- {j26}}{.271}\mspace{14mu} {{ohms}.}}}} & (84) \end{matrix}$

When compared to the solution of Equation (79), it can be seen that the reactive components are opposite and approximately equal, and thus are conjugates of each other. Thus, the impedance (Z_(ip)) seen “looking up” into the equivalent image plane model of FIGS. 9A and 9B from the perfectly conducting image ground plane is only resistive or Z_(ip)=R+j0.

Referring to FIG. 12, shown is a Smith chart 1200 that graphically illustrates an example of the effect of the discontinuous phase jumps on the impedance (Z_(ip)) seen “looking up” into the equivalent image plane model of FIG. 9B. First, because of the transition between the charge terminal and the vertical feed line conductor, the actual load impedance Z_(L) is normalized with respect to the characteristic impedance (Z_(w)) of the vertical feed line conductor and is entered on Smith chart 1200 at point 1203 (Z_(L)/Z_(w)). The normalized impedance is then transferred along the vertical feed line section by an electrical distance of θ_(y)=β_(w)h_(w)≈_(w)h_(p) (which is clockwise through an angle of 2θ_(y) on the Smith chart 1200) to point 1206 (Z₂/Z_(w)). The impedance at point 1206 is now converted to the actual impedance (Z₂) seen “looking up” into the vertical feed line conductor using Z_(w).

Second, because of the transition between the vertical feed line conductor and the helical coil, the impedance Z₂ is then normalized with respect to the characteristic impedance (Z_(c)) of the helical coil. This normalized impedance can now be entered on the Smith chart 1200 at point 1209 (Z₂/Z_(c)) and transferred along the helical coil transmission line section by an electrical distance θ_(c)=β_(p)H, (which is clockwise through an angle equal to 2θ_(c) on the Smith chart 1200) to point 1212 (Z_(base)/Z_(c)). The jump between point 1206 and point 1209 is a result of the discontinuity in the impedance ratios. The impedance looking into the base of the coil at point 1212 is then converted to the actual impedance (Z_(base)) seen “looking up” into the base of the coil (or the guided surface wave probe 300) using Z_(c).

Third, because of the transition between the helical coil and the lossy conducting medium, the impedance at Z_(base) is then normalized with respect to the characteristic impedance (Z_(o)) of the modeled image space below the physical boundary of the lossy conducting medium (e.g., the ground surface). This normalized impedance can now be entered on the Smith chart 1200 at point 1215 (Z_(base)/Z_(o)), and transferred along the subsurface image transmission line section by an electrical distance θ_(d)=β_(o) d/2 (which is clockwise through an angle equal to 2θ_(d) on the Smith chart 1200) to point 1218 (Z_(ip)/Z_(o)). The jump between point 1212 and point 1215 is a result of the discontinuity in the impedance ratios. The impedance looking into the subsurface image transmission line at point 1218 is now converted to an actual impedance (Z_(ip)) using Z_(o). When this system is resonated, the impedance at point 1218 is Z_(ip)=R_(ip)+j0. On the Smith chart 1200, Z_(base)/Z_(o) is a larger reactance than Z_(base)/Z_(c). This is because the characteristic impedance (Z_(c)) of a helical coil is considerably larger than the characteristic impedance Z_(o) of free space.

When properly adjusted and tuned, the oscillations on a structure of sufficient physical height are actually composed of a traveling wave, which is phase delayed to match the angle of the wave tilt associated with the lossy conducting medium (Φ=Ψ), plus a standing wave which is electrically brought into resonance (Z_(ip)=R+j0) by a combination of the phase delays of the transmission line sections of the guided surface waveguide probe 300 plus the phase discontinuities due to jumps in the ratios of the characteristic impedances, as illustrated on the Smith chart 1200 of FIG. 12. The above example illustrates how the three considerations discussed above can be satisfied for launching guided surface traveling waves on the lossy conducting medium.

Field strength measurements were carried out to verify the ability of the guided surface waveguide probe 300 b (FIG. 7) to couple into a guided surface wave or a transmission line mode. A 70 pF circular plate capacitor was elevated to a height of 16 feet (4.88 meters) and charged to 30 volts (peak-to-peak) at a frequency of f_(o)=1.85 MHz (λ_(o)=162.162 meters) over soil with constitutive parameters, measured at f_(o), with a relative permittivity of ∈_(r)=15 and a conductivity of σ₁=0.010 mhos/m. The measured data (documented with a NIST-traceable field strength meter) is tabulated below in TABLE 1.

TABLE 1 Range Measured FS w/FIM- Predicted FS Percent (miles) 41 (μV/m) (μV/m) Difference 0.6 3400 3415 −0.44% 2 1300 1296 +0.31% 3 840 814 +3.19% 4 560 542 +3.32% 5 380 373 +1.88% 6 270 262 +3.05% 7 190 187 +1.60% 8 140 134 +4.48% 9 100 97 +3.09% 10 70 71 −1.41%

Referring to FIG. 13, shown is the measured field strength in mV/m (circles) vs. range (in miles) with respect to the theoretical Zenneck surface wave field strengths for 100% and 85% electric charge, as well as the conventional Norton radiated ground-wave predicted for a 16 foot top-loaded vertical mast (monopole at 2.5% radiation efficiency). The quantity h corresponds to the height of the vertical conducting mast for Norton ground wave radiation with a 55 ohm ground stake. The predicted Zenneck fields were calculated from Equation (3), and the standard Norton ground wave was calculated by conventional means. A statistical analysis gave a minimized RMS deviation between the measured and theoretical fields for an electrical efficiency of 97.4%.

When the electric fields produced by a guided surface waveguide probe 300 (FIG. 3) are established by matching the traveling wave phase delay of the feed network to the wave tilt angle and the probe structure is resonated with respect to the perfectly conducting image ground plane at complex depth z=−d/2, the fields are substantially mode-matched to a guided surface waveguide mode on the surface of the lossy conducting medium, a guided surface traveling wave is launched along the surface of the lossy conducting medium. As illustrated in FIG. 1, the guided field strength curve 103 of the guided electromagnetic field has a characteristic exponential decay of e^(−αd)/√{square root over (d)} and exhibits a distinctive knee 109 on the log-log scale.

In summary, both analytically and experimentally, the traveling wave component on the structure of the guided surface waveguide probe 300 has a phase delay (Φ) at its upper terminal that matches the angle (Ψ) of the wave tilt of the surface traveling wave (Φ=Ψ). Under this condition, the surface waveguide may be considered to be “mode-matched”. Furthermore, the resonant standing wave component on the structure of the guided surface waveguide probe 300 has a V_(MAX) at the charge terminal T₁ and a V_(MIN) down at the image plane 809 (FIG. 8) where Z_(ip)=R_(ip)+j 0 at a complex depth of z=−d/2, not at the connection at the physical boundary 806 of the lossy conducting medium 303 (FIG. 8). Lastly, the charge terminal T₁ is of sufficient height H₁ of FIG. 3 (h≧R_(x) tan ψ_(i,B)) so that electromagnetic waves incident onto the lossy conducting medium 303 at the complex Brewster angle do so out at a distance (≧R_(x)) where the 1/√{square root over (r)} term is predominant. Receive circuits can be utilized with one or more guided surface waveguide probes to facilitate wireless transmission and/or power delivery systems.

Referring next to FIGS. 14A, 14B, 14C and 15, shown are examples of generalized receive circuits for using the surface-guided waves in wireless power delivery systems. FIGS. 14A and 14B-14C include a linear probe 1403 and a tuned resonator 1406, respectively. FIG. 15 is a magnetic coil 1409 according to various embodiments of the present disclosure. According to various embodiments, each one of the linear probe 1403, the tuned resonator 1406, and the magnetic coil 1409 may be employed to receive power transmitted in the form of a guided surface wave on the surface of a lossy conducting medium 303 (FIG. 3) according to various embodiments. As mentioned above, in one embodiment the lossy conducting medium 303 comprises a terrestrial medium (or earth).

With specific reference to FIG. 14A, the open-circuit terminal voltage at the output terminals 1413 of the linear probe 1403 depends upon the effective height of the linear probe 1403. To this end, the terminal point voltage may be calculated as

V _(T)=∫₀ ^(h) ^(e) E _(inc) ·dl,  (85)

where E_(inc) is the strength of the incident electric field induced on the linear probe 1403 in Volts per meter, dl is an element of integration along the direction of the linear probe 1403, and h_(e) is the effective height of the linear probe 1403. An electrical load 1416 is coupled to the output terminals 1413 through an impedance matching network 1419.

When the linear probe 1403 is subjected to a guided surface wave as described above, a voltage is developed across the output terminals 1413 that may be applied to the electrical load 1416 through a conjugate impedance matching network 1419 as the case may be. In order to facilitate the flow of power to the electrical load 1416, the electrical load 1416 should be substantially impedance matched to the linear probe 1403 as will be described below.

Referring to FIG. 14B, a ground current excited coil 1406 a possessing a phase shift equal to the wave tilt of the guided surface wave includes a charge terminal T_(R) that is elevated (or suspended) above the lossy conducting medium 303. The charge terminal T_(R) has a self-capacitance C_(R). In addition, there may also be a bound capacitance (not shown) between the charge terminal T_(R) and the lossy conducting medium 303 depending on the height of the charge terminal T_(R) above the lossy conducting medium 303. The bound capacitance should preferably be minimized as much as is practicable, although this may not be entirely necessary in every instance of a guided surface waveguide probe 300.

The tuned resonator 1406 a also includes a receiver network comprising a coil L_(R) having a phase shift Φ. One end of the coil L_(R) is coupled to the charge terminal T_(R), and the other end of the coil L_(R) is coupled to the lossy conducting medium 303. The receiver network can include a vertical supply line conductor that couples the coil L_(R) to the charge terminal T_(R). To this end, the coil 1406 a (which may also be referred to as tuned resonator L_(R)-C_(R)) comprises a series-adjusted resonator as the charge terminal C_(R) and the coil L_(R) are situated in series. The phase delay of the coil 1406 a can be adjusted by changing the size and/or height of the charge terminal T_(R), and/or adjusting the size of the coil L_(R) so that the phase Φ of the structure is made substantially equal to the angle of the wave tilt Ψ. The phase delay of the vertical supply line can also be adjusted by, e.g., changing length of the conductor.

For example, the reactance presented by the self-capacitance C_(R) is calculated as 1/jωC_(R). Note that the total capacitance of the structure 1406 a may also include capacitance between the charge terminal T_(R) and the lossy conducting medium 303, where the total capacitance of the structure 1406 a may be calculated from both the self-capacitance C_(R) and any bound capacitance as can be appreciated. According to one embodiment, the charge terminal T_(R) may be raised to a height so as to substantially reduce or eliminate any bound capacitance. The existence of a bound capacitance may be determined from capacitance measurements between the charge terminal T_(R) and the lossy conducting medium 303 as previously discussed.

The inductive reactance presented by a discrete-element coil L_(R) may be calculated as jωL, where L is the lumped-element inductance of the coil L_(R). If the coil L_(R) is a distributed element, its equivalent terminal-point inductive reactance may be determined by conventional approaches. To tune the structure 1406 a, one would make adjustments so that the phase delay is equal to the wave tilt for the purpose of mode-matching to the surface waveguide at the frequency of operation. Under this condition, the receiving structure may be considered to be “mode-matched” with the surface waveguide. A transformer link around the structure and/or an impedance matching network 1423 may be inserted between the probe and the electrical load 1426 in order to couple power to the load. Inserting the impedance matching network 1423 between the probe terminals 1421 and the electrical load 1426 can effect a conjugate-match condition for maximum power transfer to the electrical load 1426.

When placed in the presence of surface currents at the operating frequencies power will be delivered from the surface guided wave to the electrical load 1426. To this end, an electrical load 1426 may be coupled to the structure 1406 a by way of magnetic coupling, capacitive coupling, or conductive (direct tap) coupling. The elements of the coupling network may be lumped components or distributed elements as can be appreciated.

In the embodiment shown in FIG. 14B, magnetic coupling is employed where a coil L_(s) is positioned as a secondary relative to the coil L_(R) that acts as a transformer primary. The coil L_(s) may be link-coupled to the coil L_(R) by geometrically winding it around the same core structure and adjusting the coupled magnetic flux as can be appreciated. In addition, while the receiving structure 1406 a comprises a series-tuned resonator, a parallel-tuned resonator or even a distributed-element resonator of the appropriate phase delay may also be used.

While a receiving structure immersed in an electromagnetic field may couple energy from the field, it can be appreciated that polarization-matched structures work best by maximizing the coupling, and conventional rules for probe-coupling to waveguide modes should be observed. For example, a TE₂₀ (transverse electric mode) waveguide probe may be optimal for extracting energy from a conventional waveguide excited in the TE₂₀ mode. Similarly, in these cases, a mode-matched and phase-matched receiving structure can be optimized for coupling power from a surface-guided wave. The guided surface wave excited by a guided surface waveguide probe 300 on the surface of the lossy conducting medium 303 can be considered a waveguide mode of an open waveguide. Excluding waveguide losses, the source energy can be completely recovered. Useful receiving structures may be E-field coupled, H-field coupled, or surface-current excited.

The receiving structure can be adjusted to increase or maximize coupling with the guided surface wave based upon the local characteristics of the lossy conducting medium 303 in the vicinity of the receiving structure. To accomplish this, the phase delay (Φ) of the receiving structure can be adjusted to match the angle (Ψ) of the wave tilt of the surface traveling wave at the receiving structure. If configured appropriately, the receiving structure may then be tuned for resonance with respect to the perfectly conducting image ground plane at complex depth z=−d/2.

For example, consider a receiving structure comprising the tuned resonator 1406 a of FIG. 14B, including a coil L_(R) and a vertical supply line connected between the coil L_(R) and a charge terminal T_(R). With the charge terminal T_(R) positioned at a defined height above the lossy conducting medium 303, the total phase shift Φ of the coil L_(R) and vertical supply line can be matched with the angle (Ψ) of the wave tilt at the location of the tuned resonator 1406 a. From Equation (22), it can be seen that the wave tilt asymptotically passes to

$\begin{matrix} {{W = {{{W}^{j\; \Psi}} = {\frac{E_{\rho}}{E_{z}}\underset{\rho->\infty}{}\frac{1}{\sqrt{ɛ_{r} - {j\; \frac{\sigma_{1}}{\omega \; ɛ_{0}}}}}}}},} & (86) \end{matrix}$

where ∈_(r) comprises the relative permittivity and σ₁ is the conductivity of the lossy conducting medium 303 at the location of the receiving structure, ∈_(o) is the permittivity of free space, and ω=2πf, where f is the frequency of excitation. Thus, the wave tilt angle (Ψ) can be determined from Equation (86).

The total phase shift (Φ=θ_(c)+θ_(y)) of the tuned resonator 1406 a includes both the phase delay (θ_(c)) through the coil L_(R) and the phase delay of the vertical supply line (θ_(y)). The spatial phase delay along the conductor length l_(w) of the vertical supply line can be given by θ_(y)=β_(w)l_(w), where β_(w) is the propagation phase constant for the vertical supply line conductor. The phase delay due to the coil (or helical delay line) is θ_(c)=β_(p)l_(c), with a physical length of l_(c) and a propagation factor of

$\begin{matrix} {{\beta_{p} = {\frac{2\pi}{\lambda_{p}} = \frac{2\pi}{V_{f}\lambda_{0}}}},} & (87) \end{matrix}$

where V_(f) is the velocity factor on the structure, λ₀ is the wavelength at the supplied frequency, and λ_(p) is the propagation wavelength resulting from the velocity factor V_(f). One or both of the phase delays (θ_(c)+θ_(y)) can be adjusted to match the phase shift Φ to the angle (Ψ) of the wave tilt. For example, a tap position may be adjusted on the coil L_(R) of FIG. 14B to adjust the coil phase delay (θ_(c)) to match the total phase shift to the wave tilt angle (Φ=Ψ). For example, a portion of the coil can be bypassed by the tap connection as illustrated in FIG. 14B. The vertical supply line conductor can also be connected to the coil L_(R) via a tap, whose position on the coil may be adjusted to match the total phase shift to the angle of the wave tilt.

Once the phase delay (Φ) of the tuned resonator 1406 a has been adjusted, the impedance of the charge terminal T_(R) can then be adjusted to tune to resonance with respect to the perfectly conducting image ground plane at complex depth z=−d/2. This can be accomplished by adjusting the capacitance of the charge terminal T₁ without changing the traveling wave phase delays of the coil L_(R) and vertical supply line. The adjustments are similar to those described with respect to FIGS. 9A and 9B and the Smith chart of FIG. 12.

The impedance seen “looking down” into the lossy conducting medium 303 to the complex image plane is given by:

Z _(in) =R _(in) +jX _(in) =Z _(o) tan h(jβ _(o)(d/2)),  (88)

where β_(o)=ω√{square root over (μ_(o)∈_(o))}. For vertically polarized sources over the earth, the depth of the complex image plane can be given by:

d/2≈1/√{square root over (jωμ ₁σ₁−ω²μ₁∈₁)},  (89)

where μ₁ is the permeability of the lossy conducting medium 303 and ∈₁=∈_(r)∈_(o).

At the base of the tuned resonator 1406 a, the impedance seen “looking up” into the receiving structure is Z_(↓)=Z_(base) as illustrated in FIG. 9A. With a terminal impedance of:

$\begin{matrix} {{Z_{R} = \frac{1}{j\; \omega \; C_{R}}},} & (90) \end{matrix}$

where C_(R) is the self-capacitance of the charge terminal T_(R), the impedance seen “looking up” into the vertical supply line conductor of the tuned resonator 1406 a is given by:

$\begin{matrix} {{Z_{2} = {{Z_{W}\frac{Z_{R} + {Z_{w}{\tanh \left( {j\; \beta_{w}h_{w}} \right)}}}{Z_{w} + {Z_{R}{\tanh \left( {j\; \beta_{w}h_{w}} \right)}}}} = {Z_{W}\frac{Z_{R} + {Z_{w}{\tanh \left( {j\; \theta_{y}} \right)}}}{Z_{w} + {Z_{R}{\tanh \left( {j\; \theta_{y}} \right)}}}}}},} & (91) \end{matrix}$

and the impedance seen “looking up” into the coil L_(R) of the tuned resonator 1406 a is given by:

$\begin{matrix} {Z_{base} = {{R_{base} + {j\; X_{base}}} = {{Z_{R}\frac{Z_{2} + {Z_{R}{\tanh \left( {j\; \beta_{p}H} \right)}}}{Z_{R} + {Z_{2}{\tanh \left( {j\; \beta_{p}H} \right)}}}} = {Z_{c}{\frac{Z_{2} + {Z_{R}{\tanh \left( {j\; \theta_{c}} \right)}}}{Z_{R} + {Z_{2}{\tanh \left( {j\; \theta_{c}} \right)}}}.}}}}} & (92) \end{matrix}$

By matching the reactive component (X_(in)) seen “looking down” into the lossy conducting medium 303 with the reactive component (X_(base)) seen “looking up” into the tuned resonator 1406 a, the coupling into the guided surface waveguide mode may be maximized.

Referring next to FIG. 14C, shown is an example of a tuned resonator 1406 b that does not include a charge terminal T_(R) at the top of the receiving structure. In this embodiment, the tuned resonator 1406 b does not include a vertical supply line coupled between the coil L_(R) and the charge terminal T_(R). Thus, the total phase shift (Φ) of the tuned resonator 1406 b includes only the phase delay (θ_(c)) through the coil L_(R). As with the tuned resonator 1406 a of FIG. 14B, the coil phase delay θ_(c) can be adjusted to match the angle (Ψ) of the wave tilt determined from Equation (86), which results in Φ=Ψ. While power extraction is possible with the receiving structure coupled into the surface waveguide mode, it is difficult to adjust the receiving structure to maximize coupling with the guided surface wave without the variable reactive load provided by the charge terminal T_(R).

Referring to FIG. 14D, shown is a flow chart illustrating an example of adjusting a receiving structure to substantially mode-match to a guided surface waveguide mode on the surface of the lossy conducting medium 303. Beginning with 1453, if the receiving structure includes a charge terminal T_(R) (e.g., of the tuned resonator 1406 a of FIG. 14B), then the charge terminal T_(R) is positioned at a defined height above a lossy conducting medium 303 at 1456. As the surface guided wave has been established by a guided surface waveguide probe 300, the physical height (h_(p)) of the charge terminal T_(R) height may be below that of the effective height. The physical height may be selected to reduce or minimize the bound charge on the charge terminal T_(R) (e.g., four times the spherical diameter of the charge terminal). If the receiving structure does not include a charge terminal T_(R) (e.g., of the tuned resonator 1406 b of FIG. 14C), then the flow proceeds to 1459.

At 1459, the electrical phase delay Φ of the receiving structure is matched to the complex wave tilt angle Ψ defined by the local characteristics of the lossy conducting medium 303. The phase delay (θ_(c)) of the helical coil and/or the phase delay (θ_(y)) of the vertical supply line can be adjusted to make Φ equal to the angle (Ψ) of the wave tilt (W). The angle (Ψ) of the wave tilt can be determined from Equation (86). The electrical phase Φ can then be matched to the angle of the wave tilt. For example, the electrical phase delay Φ=θ_(c)+θ_(y) can be adjusted by varying the geometrical parameters of the coil L_(R) and/or the length (or height) of the vertical supply line conductor.

Next at 1462, the load impedance of the charge terminal T_(R) can be tuned to resonate the equivalent image plane model of the tuned resonator 1406 a. The depth (d/2) of the conducting image ground plane 809 (FIG. 9A) below the receiving structure can be determined using Equation (89) and the values of the lossy conducting medium 303 (e.g., the earth) at the receiving structure, which can be locally measured. Using that complex depth, the phase shift (θ_(d)) between the image ground plane 809 and the physical boundary 806 (FIG. 9A) of the lossy conducting medium 303 can be determined using θ_(d)=β_(o) d/2. The impedance (Z_(in)) as seen “looking down” into the lossy conducting medium 303 can then be determined using Equation (88). This resonance relationship can be considered to maximize coupling with the guided surface waves.

Based upon the adjusted parameters of the coil L_(R) and the length of the vertical supply line conductor, the velocity factor, phase delay, and impedance of the coil L_(R) and vertical supply line can be determined. In addition, the self-capacitance (C_(R)) of the charge terminal T_(R) can be determined using, e.g., Equation (24). The propagation factor (β_(p)) of the coil L_(R) can be determined using Equation (87) and the propagation phase constant (β_(w)) for the vertical supply line can be determined using Equation (49). Using the self-capacitance and the determined values of the coil L_(R) and vertical supply line, the impedance (Z_(base)) of the tuned resonator 1406 a as seen “looking up” into the coil L_(R) can be determined using Equations (90), (91), and (92).

The equivalent image plane model of FIG. 9A also applies to the tuned resonator 1406 a of FIG. 14B. The tuned resonator 1406 a can be tuned to resonance with respect to the complex image plane by adjusting the load impedance Z_(R) of the charge terminal T_(R) such that the reactance component X_(base) of Z_(base) cancels out the reactance component of X_(in) of Z_(in), or X_(base)+X_(in)=0. Thus, the impedance at the physical boundary 806 (FIG. 9A) “looking up” into the coil of the tuned resonator 1406 a is the conjugate of the impedance at the physical boundary 806 “looking down” into the lossy conducting medium 303. The load impedance Z_(R) can be adjusted by varying the capacitance (C_(R)) of the charge terminal T_(R) without changing the electrical phase delay Φ=θ_(c)+θ_(y) seen by the charge terminal T_(R). An iterative approach may be taken to tune the load impedance Z_(R) for resonance of the equivalent image plane model with respect to the conducting image ground plane 809. In this way, the coupling of the electric field to a guided surface waveguide mode along the surface of the lossy conducting medium 303 (e.g., earth) can be improved and/or maximized.

Referring to FIG. 15, the magnetic coil 1409 comprises a receive circuit that is coupled through an impedance matching network 1433 to an electrical load 1436. In order to facilitate reception and/or extraction of electrical power from a guided surface wave, the magnetic coil 1409 may be positioned so that the magnetic flux of the guided surface wave, H_(φ), passes through the magnetic coil 1409, thereby inducing a current in the magnetic coil 1409 and producing a terminal point voltage at its output terminals 1429. The magnetic flux of the guided surface wave coupled to a single turn coil is expressed by

=∫∫_(A) _(CS) μ_(r)μ_(o) {right arrow over (H)}·{circumflex over (n)}dA  (93)

where

is the coupled magnetic flux, μ_(r) is the effective relative permeability of the core of the magnetic coil 1409, μ_(o) is the permeability of free space, {right arrow over (H)} is the incident magnetic field strength vector, {circumflex over (n)} is a unit vector normal to the cross-sectional area of the turns, and A_(CS) is the area enclosed by each loop. For an N-turn magnetic coil 1409 oriented for maximum coupling to an incident magnetic field that is uniform over the cross-sectional area of the magnetic coil 1409, the open-circuit induced voltage appearing at the output terminals 1429 of the magnetic coil 1409 is

$\begin{matrix} {{V = {{{- N}\frac{\mathcal{F}}{t}} \approx {{- j}\; \omega \; \mu_{r}\mu_{0}{NHA}_{CS}}}},} & (94) \end{matrix}$

where the variables are defined above. The magnetic coil 1409 may be tuned to the guided surface wave frequency either as a distributed resonator or with an external capacitor across its output terminals 1429, as the case may be, and then impedance-matched to an external electrical load 1436 through a conjugate impedance matching network 1433.

Assuming that the resulting circuit presented by the magnetic coil 1409 and the electrical load 1436 are properly adjusted and conjugate impedance matched, via impedance matching network 1433, then the current induced in the magnetic coil 1409 may be employed to optimally power the electrical load 1436. The receive circuit presented by the magnetic coil 1409 provides an advantage in that it does not have to be physically connected to the ground.

With reference to FIGS. 14A, 14B, 14C and 15, the receive circuits presented by the linear probe 1403, the mode-matched structure 1406, and the magnetic coil 1409 each facilitate receiving electrical power transmitted from any one of the embodiments of guided surface waveguide probes 300 described above. To this end, the energy received may be used to supply power to an electrical load 1416/1426/1436 via a conjugate matching network as can be appreciated. This contrasts with the signals that may be received in a receiver that were transmitted in the form of a radiated electromagnetic field. Such signals have very low available power and receivers of such signals do not load the transmitters.

It is also characteristic of the present guided surface waves generated using the guided surface waveguide probes 300 described above that the receive circuits presented by the linear probe 1403, the mode-matched structure 1406, and the magnetic coil 1409 will load the excitation source 312 (FIG. 3) that is applied to the guided surface waveguide probe 300, thereby generating the guided surface wave to which such receive circuits are subjected. This reflects the fact that the guided surface wave generated by a given guided surface waveguide probe 300 described above comprises a transmission line mode. By way of contrast, a power source that drives a radiating antenna that generates a radiated electromagnetic wave is not loaded by the receivers, regardless of the number of receivers employed.

Thus, together one or more guided surface waveguide probes 300 and one or more receive circuits in the form of the linear probe 1403, the tuned mode-matched structure 1406, and/or the magnetic coil 1409 can together make up a wireless distribution system. Given that the distance of transmission of a guided surface wave using a guided surface waveguide probe 300 as set forth above depends upon the frequency, it is possible that wireless power distribution can be achieved across wide areas and even globally.

The conventional wireless-power transmission/distribution systems extensively investigated today include “energy harvesting” from radiation fields and also sensor coupling to inductive or reactive near-fields. In contrast, the present wireless-power system does not waste power in the form of radiation which, if not intercepted, is lost forever. Nor is the presently disclosed wireless-power system limited to extremely short ranges as with conventional mutual-reactance coupled near-field systems. The wireless-power system disclosed herein probe-couples to the novel surface-guided transmission line mode, which is equivalent to delivering power to a load by a waveguide or a load directly wired to the distant power generator. Not counting the power required to maintain transmission field strength plus that dissipated in the surface waveguide, which at extremely low frequencies is insignificant relative to the transmission losses in conventional high-tension power lines at 60 Hz, all of the generator power goes only to the desired electrical load. When the electrical load demand is terminated, the source power generation is relatively idle.

Referring next to FIG. 16A shown is a schematic that represents the linear probe 1403 and the mode-matched structure 1406. FIG. 16B shows a schematic that represents the magnetic coil 1409. The linear probe 1403 and the mode-matched structure 1406 may each be considered a Thevenin equivalent represented by an open-circuit terminal voltage source V_(S) and a dead network terminal point impedance Z_(S). The magnetic coil 1409 may be viewed as a Norton equivalent represented by a short-circuit terminal current source I_(S) and a dead network terminal point impedance Z_(S). Each electrical load 1416/1426/1436 (FIGS. 14A, 14B and 15) may be represented by a load impedance Z_(L). The source impedance Z_(S) comprises both real and imaginary components and takes the form Z_(S)=R_(S)+jX_(S).

According to one embodiment, the electrical load 1416/1426/1436 is impedance matched to each receive circuit, respectively. Specifically, each electrical load 1416/1426/1436 presents through a respective impedance matching network 1419/1423/1433 a load on the probe network specified as Z_(L)′ expressed as Z_(L)′=R_(L)′+j X_(L)′, which will be equal to Z_(L)′=Z_(s)*=R_(s)−j X_(s), where the presented load impedance Z_(L)′ is the complex conjugate of the actual source impedance Z_(S). The conjugate match theorem, which states that if, in a cascaded network, a conjugate match occurs at any terminal pair then it will occur at all terminal pairs, then asserts that the actual electrical load 1416/1426/1436 will also see a conjugate match to its impedance, Z_(L)′. See Everitt, W. L. and G. E. Anner, Communication Engineering, McGraw-Hill, 3^(rd) edition, 1956, p. 407. This ensures that the respective electrical load 1416/1426/1436 is impedance matched to the respective receive circuit and that maximum power transfer is established to the respective electrical load 1416/1426/1436.

Operation of a guided surface waveguide probe 300 may be controlled to adjust for variations in operational conditions associated with the guided surface waveguide probe 300. For example, an adaptive probe control system 321 (FIG. 3) can be used to control the feed network 309 and/or the charge terminal T₁ to control the operation of the guided surface waveguide probe 300. Operational conditions can include, but are not limited to, variations in the characteristics of the lossy conducting medium 303 (e.g., conductivity σ and relative permittivity ∈_(r)), variations in field strength and/or variations in loading of the guided surface waveguide probe 300. As can be seen from Equations (31), (41) and (42), the index of refraction (n), the complex Brewster angle (θ_(i,B)), and the wave tilt (|W|e^(jψ)) can be affected by changes in soil conductivity and permittivity resulting from, e.g., weather conditions.

Equipment such as, e.g., conductivity measurement probes, permittivity sensors, ground parameter meters, field meters, current monitors and/or load receivers can be used to monitor for changes in the operational conditions and provide information about current operational conditions to the adaptive probe control system 321. The probe control system 321 can then make one or more adjustments to the guided surface waveguide probe 300 to maintain specified operational conditions for the guided surface waveguide probe 300. For instance, as the moisture and temperature vary, the conductivity of the soil will also vary. Conductivity measurement probes and/or permittivity sensors may be located at multiple locations around the guided surface waveguide probe 300. Generally, it would be desirable to monitor the conductivity and/or permittivity at or about the Hankel crossover distance R_(x) for the operational frequency. Conductivity measurement probes and/or permittivity sensors may be located at multiple locations (e.g., in each quadrant) around the guided surface waveguide probe 300.

FIG. 17A shows an example of a conductivity measurement probe that can be installed for monitoring changes in soil conductivity. As shown in FIG. 17A, a series of measurement probes are inserted along a straight line in the soil. For example, the probes may be 9/16-inch diameter rods with a penetration depth of 12 inches or more, and spaced apart by d=18 inches. DS1 is a 100 Watt light bulb and R1 is a 5 Watt, 14.6 Ohm resistance. By applying an AC voltage to the circuit and measuring V1 across the resistance and V2 across the center probes, the conductivity can be determined by the weighted ratio of σ=21(V1/V2). The measurements can be filtered to obtain measurements related only to the AC voltage supply frequency. Different configurations using other voltages, frequencies, probe sizes, depths and/or spacing may also be utilized.

Open wire line probes can also be used to measure conductivity and permittivity of the soil. As illustrated in FIG. 17B, impedance is measured between the tops of two rods inserted into the soil (lossy medium) using, e.g., an impedance analyzer. If an impedance analyzer is utilized, measurements (R+jX) can be made over a range of frequencies and the conductivity and permittivity determined from the frequency dependent measurements using

$\begin{matrix} {{\sigma = {{{\frac{8.84}{C_{0}}\left\lbrack \frac{R}{R^{2} + X^{2}} \right\rbrack}\mspace{14mu} {and}\mspace{14mu} ɛ_{r}} = {\frac{10^{6}}{2\pi \; f\; C_{0}}\left\lbrack \frac{R}{R^{2} + X^{2}} \right\rbrack}}},} & (95) \end{matrix}$

where C₀ is the capacitance in pF of the probe in air.

The conductivity measurement probes and/or permittivity sensors can be configured to evaluate the conductivity and/or permittivity on a periodic basis and communicate the information to the probe control system 321 (FIG. 3). The information may be communicated to the probe control system 321 through a network such as, but not limited to, a LAN, WLAN, cellular network, or other appropriate wired or wireless communication network. Based upon the monitored conductivity and/or permittivity, the probe control system 321 may evaluate the variation in the index of refraction (n), the complex Brewster angle (θ_(i,B)), and/or the wave tilt (|W|e^(jψ)) and adjust the guided surface waveguide probe 300 to maintain the phase delay (Φ) of the feed network 309 equal to the wave tilt angle (Ψ) and/or maintain resonance of the equivalent image plane model of the guided surface waveguide probe 300. This can be accomplished by adjusting, e.g., θ_(y), θ_(c) and/or C_(T). For instance, the probe control system 321 can adjust the self-capacitance of the charge terminal T₁ or the phase delay (θ_(y), θ_(c)) applied to the charge terminal T₁ to maintain the electrical launching efficiency of the guided surface wave at or near its maximum. The phase applied to the charge terminal T₁ can be adjusted by varying the tap position on the coil 709, and/or by including a plurality of predefined taps along the coil 709 and switching between the different predefined tap locations to maximize the launching efficiency.

Field or field strength (FS) meters (e.g., a FIM-41 FS meter, Potomac Instruments, Inc., Silver Spring, Md.) may also be distributed about the guided surface waveguide probe 300 to measure field strength of fields associated with the guided surface wave. The field or FS meters can be configured to detect the field strength and/or changes in the field strength (e.g., electric field strength) and communicate that information to the probe control system 321. The information may be communicated to the probe control system 321 through a network such as, but not limited to, a LAN, WLAN, cellular network, or other appropriate communication network. As the load and/or environmental conditions change or vary during operation, the guided surface waveguide probe 300 may be adjusted to maintain specified field strength(s) at the FS meter locations to ensure appropriate power transmission to the receivers and the loads they supply.

For example, the phase delay (Φ=θ_(y)+θ_(c)) applied to the charge terminal T₁ can be adjusted to match the wave tilt angle (Ψ). By adjusting one or both phase delays, the guided surface waveguide probe 300 can be adjusted to ensure the wave tilt corresponds to the complex Brewster angle. This can be accomplished by adjusting a tap position on the coil 709 (FIG. 7) to change the phase delay supplied to the charge terminal T₁. The voltage level supplied to the charge terminal T₁ can also be increased or decreased to adjust the electric field strength. This may be accomplished by adjusting the output voltage of the excitation source 312 (FIG. 3) or by adjusting or reconfiguring the feed network 309 (FIG. 3). For instance, the position of the tap 724 (FIG. 7) for the AC source 712 (FIG. 7) can be adjusted to increase the voltage seen by the charge terminal T₁. Maintaining field strength levels within predefined ranges can improve coupling by the receivers, reduce ground current losses, and avoid interference with transmissions from other guided surface waveguide probes 300.

Referring to FIG. 18, shown is an example of an adaptive control system 330 including the probe control system 321 of FIG. 3, which is configured to adjust the operation of a guided surface waveguide probe 300, based upon monitored conditions. As in FIGS. 3 and 7, an AC source 712 acts as the excitation source (312 of FIG. 3) for the charge terminal T₁. The AC source 712 is coupled to the guided surface waveguide probe 400 d through a feed network (309 of FIG. 3) comprising a coil 709. The AC source 712 can be connected across a lower portion of the coil 709 through a tap 724, as shown in FIG. 7, or can be inductively coupled to the coil 709 by way of a primary coil. The coil 709 can be coupled to a ground stake 715 (FIG. 7) at a first end and the charge terminal T₁ at a second end. In some implementations, the connection to the charge terminal T₁ can be adjusted using a tap 721 (FIG. 7) at the second end of the coil 709. An ammeter located between the coil 709 and ground stake 715 can be used to provide an indication of the magnitude of the current flow (I₀) at the base of the guided surface waveguide probe 300. Alternatively, a current clamp may be used around the conductor coupled to the ground stake 715 to obtain an indication of the magnitude of the current flow (I₀).

The probe control system 321 can be implemented with hardware, firmware, software executed by hardware, or a combination thereof. For example, the probe control system 321 can include processing circuitry including a processor and a memory, both of which can be coupled to a local interface such as, for example, a data bus with an accompanying control/address bus as can be appreciated by those with ordinary skill in the art. A probe control application may be executed by the processor to adjust the operation of the guided surface waveguide probe 400 based upon monitored conditions. The probe control system 321 can also include one or more network interfaces for communicating with the various monitoring devices. Communications can be through a network such as, but not limited to, a LAN, WLAN, cellular network, or other appropriate communication network. The probe control system 321 may comprise, for example, a computer system such as a server, desktop computer, laptop, or other system with like capability.

The adaptive control system 330 can include one or more ground parameter meter(s) 333 such as, but not limited to, a conductivity measurement probe of FIG. 17A and/or an open wire probe of FIG. 17B. The ground parameter meter(s) 333 can be distributed about the guided surface waveguide probe 300 at, e.g., about the Hankel crossover distance (R_(x)) associated with the probe operating frequency. For example, an open wire probe of FIG. 17B may be located in each quadrant around the guided surface waveguide probe 300 to monitor the conductivity and permittivity of the lossy conducting medium as previously described. The ground parameter meter(s) 333 can be configured to determine the conductivity and permittivity of the lossy conducting medium on a periodic basis and communicate the information to the probe control system 321 for potential adjustment of the guided surface waveguide probe 300. In some cases, the ground parameter meter(s) 333 may communicate the information to the probe control system 321 only when a change in the monitored conditions is detected.

The adaptive control system 330 can also include one or more field meter(s) 336 such as, but not limited to, an electric field strength (FS) meter. The field meter(s) 336 can be distributed about the guided surface waveguide probe 300 beyond the Hankel crossover distance (R_(x)) where the guided field strength curve 103 (FIG. 1) dominates the radiated field strength curve 106 (FIG. 1). For example, a plurality of filed meters 336 may be located along one or more radials extending outward from the guided surface waveguide probe 300 to monitor the electric field strength as previously described. The field meter(s) 336 can be configured to determine the field strength on a periodic basis and communicate the information to the probe control system 321 for potential adjustment of the guided surface waveguide probe 300. In some cases, the field meter(s) 336 may communicate the information to the probe control system 321 only when a change in the monitored conditions is detected.

Other variables can also be monitored and used to adjust the operation of the guided surface waveguide probe 300. For instance, the ground current flowing through the ground stake 715 (FIG. 7) can be used to monitor the operation of the guided surface waveguide probe 300. For example, the ground current can provide an indication of changes in the loading of the guided surface waveguide probe 300 and/or the coupling of the electric field into the guided surface wave mode on the surface of the lossy conducting medium 303. Real power delivery may be determined by monitoring the AC source 712 (or excitation source 312 of FIG. 3). In some implementations, the guided surface waveguide probe 300 may be adjusted to maximize coupling into the guided surface waveguide mode based at least in part upon the current indication. By adjusting the phase delay (Φ=θ_(y)+θ_(c)) supplied to the charge terminal T₁, the match with the wave tilt angle (Ψ) can be maintained for illumination at the complex Brewster angle for guided surface wave transmissions in the lossy conducting medium 303 (e.g., the earth). This can be accomplished by adjusting the tap position on the coil 709. However, the ground current can also be affected by receiver loading. If the ground current is above the expected current level, then this may indicate that unaccounted loading of the guided surface waveguide probe 400 is taking place.

The excitation source 312 (or AC source 712) can also be monitored to ensure that overloading does not occur. As real load on the guided surface waveguide probe 300 increases, the output voltage of the excitation source 312, or the voltage supplied to the charge terminal T₁ from the coil, can be increased to increase field strength levels, thereby avoiding additional load currents. In some cases, the receivers themselves can be used as sensors monitoring the condition of the guided surface waveguide mode. For example, the receivers can monitor field strength and/or load demand at the receiver. The receivers can be configured to communicate information about current operational conditions to the probe control system 321. The information may be communicated to the probe control system 321 through a network such as, but not limited to, a LAN, WLAN, cellular network, or other appropriate communication network. Based upon the information, the probe control system 321 can then adjust the guided surface waveguide probe 300 for continued operation. For example, the phase delay (Φ=θ_(y)+θ_(c)) applied to the charge terminal T₁ can be adjusted to maintain the electrical launching efficiency of the guided surface waveguide probe 300, to supply the load demands of the receivers. In some cases, the probe control system 321 may adjust the guided surface waveguide probe 300 to reduce loading on the excitation source 312 and/or guided surface waveguide probe 300. For example, the voltage supplied to the charge terminal T₁ may be reduced to lower field strength and prevent coupling to a portion of the most distant load devices.

The guided surface waveguide probe 300 can be adjusted by the probe control system 321 using, e.g., one or more tap controllers 339. In FIG. 18, the connection from the coil 709 to the upper charge terminal T₁ is controlled by a tap controller 339. In response to a change in the monitored conditions (e.g., a change in conductivity, permittivity, and/or electric field strength), the probe control system can communicate a control signal to the tap controller 339 to initiate a change in the tap position. The tap controller 339 can be configured to vary the tap position continuously along the coil 709 or incrementally based upon predefined tap connections. The control signal can include a specified tap position or indicate a change by a defined number of tap connections. By adjusting the tap position, the phase delay (Φ) of the charge terminal T₁ can be adjusted to maintain and/or improve coupling of the guided surface waveguide mode.

The guided surface waveguide probe 300 can also be adjusted by the probe control system 321 using, e.g., a charge terminal control system 348. By adjusting the impedance of the charge terminal T₁, it is possible to adjust the coupling into the guided surface waveguide mode. The charge terminal control system 348 can be configured to change the capacitance of the charge terminal T₁. By adjusting the load impedance Z_(L) of the charge terminal T₁ while maintaining Φ=Ψ, resonance with respect to the conductive image ground plane can be maintained. In this way, coupling of the electric field to a guided surface waveguide mode along the surface of the lossy conducting medium 303 (e.g., earth) can be improved and/or maximized.

As has been discussed, the probe control system 321 of the adaptive control system 330 can monitor the operating conditions of the guided surface waveguide probe 300 by communicating with one or more remotely located monitoring devices such as, but not limited to, a ground parameter meter 333 and/or a field meter 336. The probe control system 321 can also monitor other conditions by accessing information from, e.g., the AC source 712 (or excitation source 312). Based upon the monitored information, the probe control system 321 can determine if adjustment of the guided surface waveguide probe 300 is needed to improve and/or maximize the launching efficiency. In response to a change in one or more of the monitored conditions, the probe control system 321 can initiate an adjustment of one or more of the phase delay (θ_(y), θ_(c)) applied to the charge terminal T₁ and/or the load impedance Z_(L) of the charge terminal T₁. In some implantations, the probe control system 321 can evaluate the monitored conditions to identify the source of the change. If the monitored condition(s) was caused by a change in receiver load, then adjustment of the guided surface waveguide probe 300 may be avoided. If the monitored condition(s) affect the launching efficiency of the guided surface waveguide probe 400, then the probe control system 321 can initiate adjustments of the guided surface waveguide probe 300 to improve and/or maximize the launching efficiency.

In some embodiments, the size of the charge terminal T₁ can be adjusted to control the load impedance Z_(L) of the guided surface waveguide probe 300. For example, the self-capacitance of the charge terminal T₁ can be varied by changing the size of the terminal. The charge distribution can also be improved by increasing the size of the charge terminal T₁, which can reduce the chance of an electrical discharge from the charge terminal T₁. In other embodiments, the charge terminal T₁ can include a variable inductance that can be adjusted to change the load impedance Z_(L). Control of the charge terminal T₁ size can be provided by the probe control system 321 through the charge terminal control system 348 or through a separate control system.

FIGS. 19A and 19B illustrate an example of a variable terminal 203 that can be used as a charge terminal T₁ of the guided surface waveguide probe 300 or a charge terminal T_(R) of the tuned resonator 1406 (FIGS. 14B and 14C). For example, the variable terminal 203 can include an inner cylindrical section 206 nested inside of an outer cylindrical section 209. The inner and outer cylindrical sections 206 and 209 can include plates across the bottom and top, respectively. In FIG. 19A, the cylindrically shaped variable terminal 203 is shown in a contracted condition having a first size, which can be associated with a first effective spherical diameter. To change the size of the terminal, and thus the effective spherical diameter, one or both sections of the variable terminal 203 can be extended to increase the surface area as shown in FIG. 19B. This may be accomplished by using a driving mechanism such as an electric motor or hydraulic cylinder that is electrically isolated to prevent discharge of the charge on the terminal. In this way, the capacitance (C₁ or C_(R)) of the charge terminal T₁ or T_(R), and thus the load impedance (Z_(L) or Z_(R)) of the charge terminal T₁ or T_(R), can be adjusted.

Referring next to FIG. 20, shown is a schematic representation illustrating a variable terminal 212 including a variable inductance 215 within the outer surface 218 of the terminal 212. By placing the variable inductor within the terminal 212, the load impedance Z_(L) of the guided surface waveguide probe 300 of FIG. 3 (or the load impedance Z_(R) of the tuned resonator 1406 of FIGS. 14B and 14C) can be adjusted by adjusting the inductance 215, without affecting the charge surface of the charge terminal T₁. In some embodiments, the variable terminal 203 of FIGS. 19A and 19B can include a variable inductance 215 within the cylindrical sections 206 and 209. Such a combination can provide a wider range of control over the load impedance Z_(L) of the guided surface waveguide probe 300.

It should be emphasized that the above-described embodiments of the present disclosure are merely possible examples of implementations set forth for a clear understanding of the principles of the disclosure. Many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiment(s) without departing substantially from the spirit and principles of the disclosure. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and protected by the following claims. In addition, all optional and preferred features and modifications of the described embodiments and dependent claims are usable in all aspects of the disclosure taught herein. Furthermore, the individual features of the dependent claims, as well as all optional and preferred features and modifications of the described embodiments are combinable and interchangeable with one another. 

Therefore, the following is claimed:
 1. A method, comprising: positioning a charge terminal at a defined height over a lossy conducting medium; adjusting a phase delay (Φ) of a feed network connected to the charge terminal to match a wave tilt angle (Ψ) corresponding to a complex Brewster angle of incidence (θ_(i,B)) associated with the lossy conducting medium; adjusting a load impedance (Z_(L)) of the charge terminal based upon an image ground plane impedance (Z_(in)) associated with the lossy conducting medium; and exciting the charge terminal with an excitation voltage via the feed network, where the excitation voltage establishes an electric field that couples into a guided surface waveguide mode along a surface of the lossy conducting medium.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the feed network comprises a feed line conductor coupled to the charge terminal and a coil coupled between the lossy conducting medium and the feed line conductor, where the phase delay (Φ) of the feed network includes a phase delay (θ_(y)) associated with the feed line conductor and a phase delay (θ_(c)) associated with the coil.
 3. The method of claim 2, wherein adjusting the phase delay (Φ) comprises adjusting the phase delay (θ_(r)) associated with the coil.
 4. The method of claim 3, wherein a connection of the feed line conductor is repositioned on the coil to adjust the phase delay (θ_(r)) associated with the coil.
 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the connection of the feed line conductor is repositioned on the coil via a variable tap.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the complex Brewster angle of incidence (θ_(i,B)) associated with the lossy conducting medium is based upon an operational frequency of the excitation voltage and characteristics of the lossy conducting medium.
 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the characteristics of the lossy conducting medium include conductivity and permittivity.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the image ground plane impedance (Z_(in)) is based at least in part upon a phase shift (θ_(d)) between a physical boundary of the lossy conducting medium and a conducting image ground plane.
 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the physical boundary of the lossy conducting medium and the conducting image ground plane are separated by a complex depth.
 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the load impedance (Z_(L)) of the charge terminal is adjusted based upon a reactive component of the image ground plane impedance (Z_(in)).
 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the load impedance (Z_(L)) of the charge terminal is adjusted to match the reactive component of the image ground plane impedance (Z_(in)) with a structure impedance (Z_(base)) associated with the feed network and the charge terminal.
 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the phase delay (Φ) of the feed network is fixed while the load impedance (Z_(L)) of the charge terminal is adjusted.
 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the charge terminal has an effective spherical diameter, and the defined height of the charge terminal is at least four times an effective spherical diameter to reduce the bound capacitance.
 14. The method of claim 1, wherein the charge terminal is coupled to an excitation source via a coil.
 15. The method of claim 1, comprising: sensing a change in a characteristic of the lossy conducting medium; and adjusting the phase delay (Φ) of the feed network connected to the charge terminal to match a modified wave tilt angle in response to the change in the characteristic of the lossy conducting medium, the modified wave tilt angle corresponding to a complex Brewster angle of incidence associated with the lossy conducting medium having the changed characteristic.
 16. The method of claim 15, comprising: adjusting the load impedance (Z_(L)) of the charge terminal based upon a new image ground plane impedance based upon the lossy conducting medium having the changed characteristic.
 17. The method of claim 1, wherein the lossy conducting medium is a terrestrial medium.
 18. A guided surface waveguide probe, comprising: a charge terminal elevated over a lossy conducting medium; and a feed network configured to couple an excitation source to the charge terminal, the feed network configured to provide a voltage to the charge terminal with a phase delay (Φ) that matches a wave tilt angle (Ψ) associated with a complex Brewster angle of incidence (θ_(i,B)) associated with the lossy conducting medium, and the charge terminal having a load impedance (Z_(L)) that is determined based upon an image ground plane impedance (Z_(in)) associated with the lossy conducting medium.
 19. The guided surface waveguide probe of claim 18, wherein the feed network comprises a feed line conductor coupled to the charge terminal and a coil coupled between the lossy conducting medium and the feed line conductor, where the phase delay (Φ) of the feed network includes a phase delay (θ_(y)) associated with the feed line conductor and a phase delay (θ_(c)) associated with the coil.
 20. The guided surface waveguide probe of claim 19, wherein the coil is a helical coil.
 21. The guided surface waveguide probe of claim 19, wherein the excitation source is coupled to the coil via a tap connection.
 22. The guided surface waveguide probe of claim 21, wherein an impedance matching network is coupled between the excitation source and the tap connection on the coil.
 23. The guided surface waveguide probe of claim 19, wherein the excitation source is magnetically coupled to the coil.
 23. The guided surface waveguide probe of claim 19, wherein the charge terminal is coupled to the coil via a tap connection.
 24. The guided surface waveguide probe of claim 18, wherein the feed network is configured to vary the phase delay (Φ) to match the wave tilt angle (Ψ).
 25. The guided surface waveguide probe of claim 18, comprising a probe control system configured to adjust the feed network based at least in part upon characteristics of the lossy conducting medium.
 26. The guided surface waveguide probe of claim 25, wherein the feed network comprises a coil coupled between the excitation source and the charge terminal, the charge terminal coupled to the coil via a variable tap.
 27. The guided surface waveguide probe of claim 26, wherein the probe control system adjusts a position of the variable tap in response to a change in the characteristics of the lossy conducting medium.
 28. A method comprising: positioning a charge terminal of a guided surface waveguide probe at a defined height over a lossy conducting medium; adjusting a traveling wave phase delay (Φ) of the guided surface waveguide probe to match a wave-tilt angle (Ψ) of a surface wave of the lossy conducting medium; simultaneously exciting a superposed standing wave on the guided surface waveguide probe by exploiting phase delays from transmission line sections of the guided surface waveguide probe plus phase jumps arising from discontinuities in characteristic impedances of the transmission line sections, the superposed standing wave based upon a complex image plane located at a complex depth from a base of the guided surface waveguide probe; and exciting the charge terminal with an excitation voltage via the transmission line sections, where an excitation charge distribution establishes an electric field that couples into a guided surface-wave waveguide mode along a surface of the lossy conducting medium. 